![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
d4rkn1ght writes:
On Wed, 12 May 2010 20:04:15 -0400, Tom Potter wrote: There was NO problem before Google bought DejaNews. DejaNews called up EXACTLY what you expected. The problem is that Google "cooks the books" on searches and feds you what they want you to see, rather than what you want to see. [...] I can't believe that after all these years, I still really miss DejaNews. Google stopped carrying for USENET a long time ago. Now they want you to use their so call stupid Google Groups. :| Don't mince words, just come right out and say "google groups sucks". Then, if you want to feel justified in that, search for that phrase, and notice that out of the probably thousands of times that's been uttered, it will only find a few percent of them. Phil -- I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away -- David Melville on r.a.s.f1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
O/T: Will Google Groups ever fix its search function? | Robert Clark | Policy | 9 | May 11th 10 02:47 PM |
ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Daniel Joseph Min | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 22nd 05 02:54 PM |
ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Daniel Joseph Min | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 22nd 05 02:54 PM |
REPOST: ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Saul Levy | Misc | 0 | March 16th 05 09:03 PM |
Google Groups Changes? | Odysseus | Misc | 1 | February 8th 05 02:47 PM |