![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 12:12*am, Doug Freyburger wrote:
*Solar cells should be plenty in Earth orbit for station keeping and orbit maintenance but interplanetary missions would work far better with more power available. *A nuclear reactor could supply power for both the drive and the rest of the vehicle. But how to get one safely aloft or enough infrastructure in place to be able to build one from spaceborn raw materials ... Well as mentioned in a previous post Russia will launch reactors without problem. If you dont want to launch the fuel from Earth how about Thorium. You could mine and concentrate it from the Moon. A thorium reactor has the advantage of needing a particle beam to operate so if the particle beam is switched off the fuel cant chain react and have a meltdown, AIUI without the beam the fission slows until the fuel cools, it's called a sub-critical reactor. Might be a good safety option for a ship. Another alternative, is a reactor using Plutonium as the core with Thorium fuel. There is one running in Moscow. Although, with this you would need the to have the russians ship the plutonium from Earth at least. Maybe the first industry on the Moon will be harvesting and concetrating Thorium for Space reactors. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When is manned spaceflight preferred? | [email protected] | Space Science Misc | 15 | August 13th 13 06:28 PM |
No clear justification for manned return to moon | Mike Rhino | Policy | 20 | January 15th 04 02:55 PM |
The End of U.S. Manned Spaceflight? | Joseph S. Powell, III | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 29th 03 07:15 PM |
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight | LooseChanj | History | 6 | July 29th 03 02:19 AM |
Management, mandate, and manned spaceflight | Jorge R. Frank | History | 1 | July 28th 03 04:38 PM |