A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Orion Justification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old April 17th 10, 11:42 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Orion Justification

On 4/17/2010 10:04 AM, Jorge R. Frank wrote:

Neil, why are you continuing to ask questions that *you* *yourself*
provided answers for in your initial post?

Without a dedicated CRV, *all* the ISS Commercial Crew vehicles would
have the six-month stay requirement levied upon them. With a dedicated
CRV, that requirement is relaxed and the Commercial Crew vehicles would
only be required to perform short-term rotation.


SpaceX is already designing Dragon to be able to do that, for their
DragonLab commercial variant, so it doesn't really change anything for
them or add to Dragon's development costs.

Pat

  #22  
Old April 18th 10, 02:42 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brian Thorn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,266
Default Orion Justification

On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:42:44 -0800, Pat Flannery
wrote:


SpaceX is already designing Dragon to be able to do that, for their
DragonLab commercial variant, so it doesn't really change anything for
them or add to Dragon's development costs.


Big difference in reliability requirements, though. If a DragonLab
fails, SpaceX has a few unhappy customers. If DragonLifeboat fails, we
have dead astronauts.

Brian
  #23  
Old April 19th 10, 06:26 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default Orion Justification

Pat Flannery wrote:
That's certainly the situation in a nutshell. Soyuz has to be the
"Jeep" of spacecraft, it's not ideal for any particular task, but
incredibly adaptable and versatile enough to perform a whole
plethora* of missions fairly well.


* Triple word score...I think that is the second or third time I've

used that word in writing in my entire life. The sucker has just
been sitting around in the back of my vocabulary, getting more
covered in cobwebs and dust as the decades moved on. ;-)

If you practice with sufficient diligence you will discover a
veritable plethora of vernacular possiblities in podiatric repose with
which to embellish your inter-personal communications.

rick jones
--
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, rebirth...
where do you want to be today?
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #24  
Old April 19th 10, 11:14 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Orion Justification

On 4/19/2010 9:26 AM, Rick Jones wrote:


If you practice with sufficient diligence you will discover a
veritable plethora of vernacular possiblities in podiatric repose with
which to embellish your inter-personal communications.


You can't fool me...you're William F. Buckley, aren't you?
AREN'T YOU?
I thought so.
But if you're here...then who's in the coffin?
It's Gore Vidal, isn't it Mr. Buckley?
ISN'T IT? ;-)

Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A minor justification Skywise Astronomy Misc 0 May 30th 09 11:28 PM
A minor justification Skywise Amateur Astronomy 0 May 30th 09 11:28 PM
The justification of mediocre eyepieces RichA Amateur Astronomy 4 December 18th 04 02:52 PM
No clear justification for manned return to moon Mike Rhino Policy 20 January 15th 04 02:55 PM
Possible Justification for a Lunar Base? John W. Landrum Technology 2 September 30th 03 06:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.