EINSTEINIANA CAN DO WITHOUT CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT

On Apr 19, 3:22*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Initially (e.g. in 1887) the null result of the Michelson-Morley
experiment unequivocally confirmed VARIABLE speed of light as
predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and refuted any
possible theory consistent with the assumption that the speed of light
is independent of the speed of the emitter (an independence to become
the essence of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate).

Great! This only proves the power of propaganda! Now with that
(c(v=V) = c(v=0) + V) confirmed and e=0.5.m.v.v.N(N-k) we can have an
entirely new physics, by throwing out entropy and relativity, and
generalisind Newton's first and third laws of motion.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


Only a special
ad hoc procrusteanization of the reality (time and length had to
become dependent on the speed of the system) was able to reverse the
importance of the experiment and make it confirm what it had
previously refuted:

http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC
"Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann
p.92: "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had
suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one,
the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding
train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the
speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object
emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume
that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to
Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null
result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to
contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as
we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null
result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian
ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more
or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether."

Einstein "resisted the temptation" because his 1905 false light
postulate immediately produced breathtaking miracles (travelling
clocks run slower etc) and thereby promised to convert him into Divine
Albert whereas the VARIABLE speed of light predicted by Newton's
emission theory of light, although true in virtue of how the world is
independently of ourselves, was only able to give unimpressive results
already established in the 18th century. Still remorse haunted
Einstein all along and in 1954 he even discovered that his 1905 false
light postulate had in fact killed theoretical physics:

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_De...ews_on_the_Com...
The Development of Our Views on the Composition and Essence of
Radiation by Albert Einstein, 1909
"A large body of facts shows undeniably that light has certain
fundamental properties that are better explained by Newton's emission
theory of light than by the oscillation theory. For this reason, I
believe that the next phase in the development of theoretical physics
will bring us a theory of light that can be considered a fusion of the
oscillation and emission theories. The purpose of the following
remarks is to justify this belief and to show that a profound change
in our views on the composition and essence of light is
imperative.....Then the electromagnetic fields that make up light no
longer appear as a state of a hypothetical medium, but rather as
independent entities that the light source gives off, just as in
Newton's emission theory of light......Relativity theory has changed
our views on light. Light is conceived not as a manifestation of the
state of some hypothetical medium, but rather as an independent entity
like matter. Moreover, this theory shares with the corpuscular theory
of light the unusual property that light carries inertial mass from
the emitting to the absorbing object."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/genius/
"Genius Among Geniuses" by Thomas Levenson
"And then, in June, Einstein completes special relativity, which adds
a twist to the story: Einstein's March paper treated light as
particles, but special relativity sees light as a continuous field of
waves. Alice's Red Queen can accept many impossible things before
breakfast, but it takes a supremely confident mind to do so. Einstein,
age 26, sees light as wave and particle, picking the attribute he
needs to confront each problem in turn. Now that's tough."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/ind...ontent&task=vi....
John Stachel: "Einstein discussed the other side of the particle-field
dualism - get rid of fields and just have particles."
Albert Einstein 1954: "I consider it entirely possible that physics
cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous
structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air,
including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of
contemporary physics."
John Stachel's comment: "If I go down, everything goes down, ha ha,
hm, ha ha ha."

At present theoretical physics is dead but beautiful:

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/080616
"Like bronze idols that are hollow inside, Einstein built a cluster of
"Potemkin villages," which are false fronts with nothing behind them.
Grigori Potemkin (17391791) was a general-field marshal, Russian
statesman, and favorite of Empress Catherine the Great. He is alleged
to have built facades of non-existent villages along desolate
stretches of the Dnieper River to impress Catherine as she sailed to
the Crimea in 1787. Actors posing as happy peasants stood in front of
these pretty stage sets and waved to the pleased Empress. (...) The
science establishment has a powerful romantic desire to believe in
Einstein. Therefore, they are not only fooled by Einstein's tricks,
they are prepared to defend his Potemkin villages. A Potemkin village
is a pretty picture to fool the gullible romantic. Einstein was
romantically infatuated with pretty pictures. He deliberately sought
theories that were aesthetically beautiful in their harmony, symmetry,
and simplicity. He romantically believed something akin to Keats'
famous poetic summation: "Beauty is truth and truth, beauty."

Beautiful dead physics institutionalized (but "no longer getting the
kind of support it needs"):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b558k...List&p=27DFC01...
Silly Walks Applicant: "Well sir, I have a silly walk and I'd like to
obtain a Government grant to help me develop it....I think that with
Government backing I could make it very silly." Silly Walks Director:
"Mr Pudey, the very real problem is one of money. I'm afraid that the
Ministry of Silly Walks is no longer getting the kind of support it
needs. You see there's Defence, Social Security, Health, Housing,
Education, Silly Walks ... they're all supposed to get the same. But
last year, the Government spent less on the Ministry of Silly Walks
than it did on National Defence! Now we get 348,000,000 a year, which
is supposed to be spent on all our available products."

Selling beautiful dead physics:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong
with it?
Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead,
that's what's wrong with it!
Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.
Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm
looking at one right now.
Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the
Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!

Pentcho Valev

On Apr 19, 12:04*pm, Arindam Banerjee
wrote:
On Apr 19, 3:22*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Initially (e.g. in 1887) the null result of the Michelson-Morley
experiment unequivocally confirmed VARIABLE speed of light as
predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and refuted any
possible theory consistent with the assumption that the speed of light
is independent of the speed of the emitter (an independence to become
the essence of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate).

Great! *This only proves the power of propaganda! *Now with that
(c(v=V) = c(v=0) + V) confirmed and e=0.5.m.v.v.N(N-k) we can have an
entirely new physics, by throwing out entropy and relativity, and
generalisind Newton's first and third laws of motion.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee


This fits in well with your other theory that compressed peanuts can
power space ships to planet **** in the galaxy known as "morontopia"

On Apr 19, 8:14*pm, Errol wrote:
On Apr 19, 12:04*pm, Arindam Banerjee
wrote:





On Apr 19, 3:22*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Initially (e.g. in 1887) the null result of the Michelson-Morley
experiment unequivocally confirmed VARIABLE speed of light as
predicted by Newton's emission theory of light and refuted any
possible theory consistent with the assumption that the speed of light
is independent of the speed of the emitter (an independence to become
the essence of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate).

Great! *This only proves the power of propaganda! *Now with that
(c(v=V) = c(v=0) + V) confirmed and e=0.5.m.v.v.N(N-k) we can have an
entirely new physics, by throwing out entropy and relativity, and
generalisind Newton's first and third laws of motion.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

This fits in well with your other theory that compressed peanuts can
power space ships to planet **** in the galaxy known as "morontopia"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, that is your theory, and worth more than the silly ones of
einstein's, that are truly remarkable in pure nonsense.