|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
March 27th 10, 07:08 PM
posted to sci.logic,alt.philosophy,sci.astro,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
WIMBLES WOBBLE BUT THEY DON'T FALL DOWN
Pentcho Valev wrote: Clearly if "theory" is properly defined the pessimistic induction is unjustified. The transition from Newtonian to relativistic mechanics was either a transition from absolutely false to absolutely true or a transition from absolutely true to absolutely false. No matter how you define "theory", the ensuing conclusion is false. glird 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MISLED REALISM IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | October 29th 09 03:54 AM |
| PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE DEAD? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | June 3rd 09 06:14 AM |
| The Intersection of Science, Religion, Mysticism and Philosophy | Art D'Adamo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 18th 04 01:24 AM |
| The Intersection of Science, Religion, Philosophy and Mysticism | Art D'Adamo | UK Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 02:19 AM |
Hybrid Mode
