![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery writes:
Your adding a whole extra step by turning the sunlight into a electricity and then back into light again, and that's not good from a total efficiency point of view. Bingo... Far cheaper than either alternative is simply to build a larger solar power plant on the Earth's surface and skip the very expensive space-based part of the equation. Which is the crux of the cost problem for all the space-based systems, solar electric or solar thermal. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch! | Jonathan | Policy | 244 | December 26th 09 10:42 PM |
...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch! | Androcles[_23_] | History | 6 | December 23rd 09 06:26 AM |
..Space Energy Inc plans to launch prototype Space Solar Power Satellite | Jonathan | History | 10 | December 22nd 09 04:17 AM |
Forecast good for launch of Europe's latest MSG weather satellite | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | November 21st 05 06:34 PM |