FR Bending of Light -- Proof

there are no photons. see, you say taht r is "the radius
of a circle," which seems to be a confusion of the notion
of a "plane wave," whose radius is ideally infinite;
sibstitute diameter-not-in-the-plane.

* Either way, why should the "wavenumber" be a function of an unknown
value of r; but if r is stipulated it remains a constant regardless of
how many waves there might be in a given photon? *Why should the "wave
number" of the 4th wave in a series of 500 be the same as that of the
44th and the 53nd and all of them?

thus:
I would say that the LHC or its omnipotent caretakeers had
to take a few pages out of its flip-book --
just rip them right out & shred,
like the Royal Astronomer would try to do to yours, if
you were to question his Reality Bumpersticker.

comparable reason in the known physics of space and time to dismiss it
as an illusion? I know of none. The only stimulus is a negative one.

--les OEuvres!
http://wlym.com