![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 28, 9:24*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:
It seems the majority of us in this newsgroup have a conventional understanding of nuclear physics circa the 1950's, but there are groups of scientists who have a deeper understanding about it than us. Perhaps equipped with 1970's knowledge. ![]() Yeah, it's strange that this is just being investigated now. I wonder if we'll ever detect one of these stars. The trouble is, the energy of electroweak burning will be virtually all emitted as neutrinos, and thus undetectable. The photon luminosity should be hardly greater than a normal neutron star. So I guess the sign of an electroweak star will be an object that clearly can't be a black hole but is above the normal neutron-star limit, which is probably around 2.2 Msun. Andrew Usher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M-47, Open Star Cluster in Puppis; plus star clusters NGC 2423 and NGC 2425 | George Normandin[_1_] | Astro Pictures | 3 | March 4th 08 06:25 PM |
Utiyama's 1954 unfied gauge theory of gravity and electroweak-strongfields | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 1 | June 3rd 07 11:27 PM |
Cluster and Double Star see star crack during massive 'starquake'(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 22nd 05 04:37 PM |
Online star map / star chart / star atlas | Excalibur | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 12th 03 07:25 PM |
Online star map / star chart / star atlas | Excalibur | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 12th 03 07:25 PM |