A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

chapter 13 dark night sky, Olber's Paradox answered #197 AtomTotality theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 09, 04:04 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default chapter 13 dark night sky, Olber's Paradox answered #197 AtomTotality theory


PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY Universe theory:
physics characteristics: Explains Dark Night Sky
(Olber's paradox)

An electron itself is a perfect quantum blackbody cavity.
Blackbody--that is why the night sky is dark explaining
Olbers paradox. Do yourself a favor and look at
pictures of electron orbitals in a quantum physics book.
The "s" orbital is the most simple of a perfect sphere. Perfect
cavity--
that is why the microwave background radiation is quantized
and relentlessly uniform, and in addition that is why the
cosmic gamma ray bursts are relentlessly uniform.

DARK NIGHT SKY

I give purely geometrical reasons for refuting
the Steady-State
and the Big Bang theories.

The night sky should be bright, as bright as the surface of
the Sun for the Steady-State theory since the space is
plane Euclidean infinite. For the Steady-State theory there
are an infinite number of stars, and galaxies, because for an
infinite space of Euclidean (or also Lobachevskian) there must
be infinite mass via gravity. But any night that we observe
the sky we immediately realize it is dark. Thus the dark night
sky instantly refutes the Steady-State.

The Big Bang theory is also rejected by the dark night
sky observation for if the observable universe started
from a Big Bang then it started with Riemannian space since
it was a concentrated point. The geometry of a point is
Riemannian. And if the universe at present has Riemannian space
then photons would circumtravel around and come back, thus
the sky should be ablaze. It should be bright, not dark. And
if the Big Bang theory supposes that our present space is
Euclidean or Lobachevskian would imply that at some moment of
time in the past the Big Bang switched-over from being
Riemannian, because a point is Riemannian geometry, to that of
being Euclidean or Lobachevskian geometries which is ad hoc
science. If you then try to make the Big Bang theory have
finite mass to accord with a Riemannian space but space as
infinite such as Euclidean or Lobachevskian, reduces logically to
saying that the universe has at least two spaces
superpositioned at the same time, which implies the quantum
superposition principle which implies the observable universe has
structure, which implies the totality is an atom.

To inject inflationary models into the Big Bang helps the
Big Bang overcome the apparent flatness of our
observable universe, but an inflation is ad hoc for it requires
an explanation for why it should inflate? And an
inflation, no matter how big or rapid is still Riemannian space
where light from stars will circumtravel around and thus the
night sky is not as bright as the surface of the Sun, but it
is still light and not dark.

A dark night sky works only in an atom totality. The dark
night sky or Olber's paradox dispels both the Steady-State
and the Big Bang theories, leaving only the Plutonium
Atom Totality with a satisfactory answer to such a simple
question.

Why is the night sky dark? Answer. The electron
observable universe, the space of the last six
electrons, the 5f6 electrons are a quantum blackbody cavity.
Blackbody cavities, remember, was how QM originated
through the work of the great quantum physicists Stefan,
Boltzmann, Wien, Planck et al. Blackbody means dark night sky.
A simple question deserves a simple answer.

For the dark night sky problem both the Big Bang and the
Steady-State theories give these very long abstract math
arguments for why the night sky is dark. The last
time that I checked their explanation was in 1992 and
their explanation for Olber's paradox required over a 1000
pages of abstract math. My explanation above required only
a paragraph. Big Bang arguments for Olber's paradox is protracted,
convoluted, complicated, and finally unconvincing.
And the Big Bang theory can not give one answer but must rely
on two answers for this simple question of why the night sky
is dark. (A) The light from galaxies far away are
shifted so far to the red that it appears black, and (B), the
age of the universe is finite implying a finite number of
galaxies. A simple question of why is the night sky dark
deserves a simple and strongly convincing answer which
only the Plutonium Atom Totality provides. The last
electrons of plutonium is a quantum blackbody cavity
and thus the night sky is dark because blackbody is what
it is--black and dark.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
chapter 12 : the 2.71K cosmic microwave blackbody radiation #192 AtomTotality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 4th 09 06:33 AM
cores indicate Sun-Earth twice as old as Jupiter-Europa #189 AtomTotality Theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 1st 09 06:28 AM
Nebular Dust Cloud theory has contradictions #146; 3rd ed; AtomTotality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 15th 09 08:17 AM
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 8 May 20th 09 01:17 AM
The twins paradox some questions answered for Laura Nathan Jones Misc 1 December 7th 03 08:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.