![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 6:52*am, Aardvark wrote:
On Nov 1, 3:39 am, Tomm Carr wrote: Aardvark wrote: * The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun. * [When it is at the Sun's surface, * the pull of the Sun's gravity on * the ping-pong ball will be at its * maximum.] The instant the ping-pong ball plunges past the surface of the Sun, the pull of the Sun's gravity on the ping-pong ball will begin to decrease. * [This is because as the ping-pong ball * travels closer and closer to the center * of the Sun: the mass pulling on the * ping-pong ball is decreasing, all the time * that there will be a growing amount of * Sun-mass behind it pulling back on it.] Once the ping-pong ball reaches the center of the Sun it will achieve gravity equilibrium and lie forever suspended there (at the exact center of a great hollow). * * *Conclusions from the above * * * * *thought experiment: Your conclusions are flawed for a very simple reason. Thank God! I hate it when my conclusions are flawed because of very complex reasons. What you have done is a rhetorical sleight-of-hand which, like a good magician, gets us looking in one direction while the action is taking place in the other. See: This is why there should be a law against those TV programs that reveal how the tricks of magicians like me are done. You get everyone looking only at gravity and missing the other forces at work. That's in the other forces' work contract. What you say about gravity is true: it is greatest on the surface and will cancel out -- be effectively zero -- in the center. Pressure, otoh, will be least on the surface and greatest in the center. You're thinking of a bowling ball there, friend: * *[The Sun is not a bowling ball: If it were, * *we'd know where the pressure was coming * *from--But since the Sun is a ball of gas/plasma, * *it should perfectly "describes" the impression * *of gravity upon its matter ... exactly like the * *magnetic fields of a magnet's poles "describe" * *themselves on iron filings spread out on * *a sheet of paper under which you move said * *magnet. Do the experiment yourself. Remember: * *There is NO WAY for one of the Sun's "filings" * *(or: atomic particle) to "push" another anywhe * *They should all travel towards where they are * *"pulled" by gravity. ERGO: If the Sun were * *indeed being "shaped" by gravity, there would * *be no/little pressure towards the core to carry out * *any fusion reaction. That is a physical fact which * *nothing in your philosophy can dispute. THERE * *IS fusion going on at the Sun's core, otherwise * *it'd be a big ole bowling ball.] Therefore, Tommy Trust me: The Sun (and every other heavenly body) is being shaped/worked by "something" other than your laws of gravity. Go read all about it at: * * *http://physics.sdrodrian.com The answer is PAINFULLY simple: It HAD to be, otherwise IT COULDN'T BE--Even Einstein knew this, when he said that "God does not play dice." ("Physicists have suggested that the laws and constants of physics are too good - as if the universe were set up to favour life's evolution. It is as though there were, say, half a dozen dials representing the major constants of physics. Each of the dials could in principle be tuned to any of a wide range of values. Almost all of these knob- twiddlings would yield a universe in which life would be impossible. Some universes would fizzle out within the first picosecond. Others would contain no elements heavier than hydrogen and helium. In yet others, matter would never condense into stars (and you need stars in order to forge the elements of chemistry and hence life). You can estimate the very low odds against the six knobs all just happening to be correctly tuned, and conclude that a divine knob-twiddler must have been at work" IF you do not understand that the sequence is not one of six disparate/unrelated knobs but one of one leading INEVITABLY to the next. In other words: The explanation to Existence is always 1,2,3,4,5,6 ... inevitably. If any other sequece is proposed the proposal is as wrong as proposing your nephew created the universe: No proof of that can ever be right. And regardless how elegant the math may be. How is that? Because the pressure is not the result of gravity acting directly on the ping-pong ball. It is the result of gravity acting on everything else. At the surface, and at all points under the surface until it gets to the center, gravity is pulling the ball towards the center. In fact, gravity is pulling all the hydrogen (yes, helium and other elements too -- but vastly more hydrogen) toward the center. Once at the center, gravity is no longer effecting the ping-pong ball, but it is still effecting the trillions of trillions of trillions of tons of hydrogen, all being pulled, and generating pressure, toward the center -- directly at the hapless ping-pong ball. This exerts, as could well be imagined, a good deal of pressure on said ping-pong ball. Read the theory of solar system creation: All your atoms are experiencing a swirling, NOT a rush towards center (you know, like the orbiting planets, which are just merely agglomerations of atoms). The pressure towards center can NOT be the result of gravity for an universe of reasons (no pun intended). For the reason why everything is always moving towards center, go thou read it at: *http://physics.sdrodrian.com You know, when the Ptolemy System was drawn up... it all fit together perfectly. The math was mavelus! Except, of course, that a few "stars" (planets, actually, like Venus) would suddenly seem to come to a dead stop, and then go back the way they'd come!!! But that was just a few planets--Why scrap a beautiful system like Ptolemy's just for a few lousy planets that refused to obey its laws? Well, because it told you the system was rotten. Well the system of Gravity we have today to explain the way the universe works doesn't just have a few wandering planets, it has scientists losing their sanity and proposing science fiction solutions at almost EVERY turn: Time-travel (Yes: they're now quite SERIOUSLY blaming the failure at CERN on "the notion that the troubled collider is being sabotaged by its own futu A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.")... and a myriad other idiotic physical impossibilities like "dark energy." And yet these idiots refuse to accept that their extire system is rotten. Believe Einstein on this one: The solution is not 1, 483, 43, 9, 1999, 2 but 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Inevitability is ALWAYS the correct solution. You can even perform a real-world experiment to observe this principle, using a real ping-pong ball and a swimming pool. At the surface, there is no pressure on the ball -- it floats there quite happily. But cup your hand over it and push it to the bottom of the deep end. By the time you get to the bottom of the pool, the ball should be thoroughly crushed. By gravity? No, the amount of gravity pulling on the ball will not have changed significantly from the top of the pool to the bottom. It was all that water on top of the ball that generated the pressure. --Tomm Catt I already tried this experiment on the SUN itself, and burnt my hand--I suggest you try thought experiments (if you're crazy enough they'll all work out). S D Rodrianhttp://sdrodrian.comhttp://physics.sdrodrian.comhttp://mp3.sdrodrian.com Your perfectly spherical sun and pingity-pongity ball remind me of a joke I heard today. A man buys a racing dog but soon discovers that the dog is slow. He hires a vet to help him with the dog. The vet tells him "This dog is just slow, there's nothing I can do." Undaunted, the man tells the vet to "Hit the road!" and hires a geneticist. The geneticist tells him "This dog is slow. I can help you breed a faster dog but it will take many generations." Not willing to wait that long, the man tells the geneticist to "Beat it!" and travels to the nearest university to hire a physicist. Now, the dog doesn't like to travel so the man brings with him videos of the dog, several hours worth. He and the physicist watch the videos intently. After the videos are finished, the man asks the physicist "can you help me and my dog?" The physicist scratches his beard thoughtfully, turns to the man, and says ...... "Assume the dog is a sphere. ..." Bob H |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian | BradGuth | Solar | 6 | January 5th 10 11:05 PM |
The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian | Frederick Williams[_2_] | Solar | 5 | November 30th 09 01:50 AM |
The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian | Aardvark | Astronomy Misc | 30 | November 4th 09 11:51 AM |
The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian | Sleepalot[_2_] | Solar | 3 | October 26th 09 03:06 AM |
Picture Request: von Braun and Pong | gb | History | 1 | May 18th 05 04:43 AM |