![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 9, 2:13*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Dr.Colon Oscopy wrote: I couldn't get NASA channel coverage so I recorded ABC and CNN. The little brunette ditz on CNN and her telescope-penis joke were a good reminder why I am watching less-and-less TV these days. Anyway, the preliminary results are baffling, with no ejecta plume observed by anyone and the spectrum of the impact flash showing sodium for some reason. The moon is really salt?!? One of Guth's rants is true? Say it ain't so.... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 9:45*am, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Oct 9, 2:13*pm, Pat Flannery wrote: Dr.Colon Oscopy wrote: I couldn't get NASA channel coverage so I recorded ABC and CNN. The little brunette ditz on CNN and her telescope-penis joke were a good reminder why I am watching less-and-less TV these days. Anyway, the preliminary results are baffling, with no ejecta plume observed by anyone and the spectrum of the impact flash showing sodium for some reason. The moon is really salt?!? One of Guth's rants is true? Say it ain't so.... It's at least half so, because sodium is at least worth the better half of what terrestrial salt is all about, although perhaps other minerals or raw elements suitable to that extreme vacuum and solar +cosmic bombardment have recombined to create a sodium+whatever composite crystal that's equivalent to salt. I'm not exactly sure how much nitrogen exist on or within that naked moon of ours, though I bet with that much spare sodium there's more than enough nitrogen to make its very own fair share of table salt. I've also deductively suggested/speculated there's a darn good chance of some brine layers or geode pockets of brine existing within that robust crust, and for certain underneath where the average density of our Selene/moon isn't all that great (by rights of limited seismic data could even suggest that it's semi-hollow). ~ BG |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 9, 11:13*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Dr.Colon Oscopy wrote: I couldn't get NASA channel coverage so I recorded ABC and CNN. The little brunette ditz on CNN and her telescope-penis joke were a good reminder why I am watching less-and-less TV these days. Anyway, the preliminary results are baffling, with no ejecta plume observed by anyone and the spectrum of the impact flash showing sodium for some reason. Pat I would have been quite surprised it there wasn't a strong indication of sodium. So what's the big deal, just because I'm 100% correct every once in a while? ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New impact site for LCROSS water-hunting mission | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 29th 09 07:02 AM |