![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10月6日, 下午10時47分, copperhead wrote:
Has it occurred to you that NASA has spent many years, and billions of dollars, sending probes as far as they can send them in our solar system looking for ANY sign of life of ANY kind? *Logically, why would they be trying to cover up such a discovery? Especially if it were nearby enough that we could potentially send someone there physically to check it out. It was possible that NASA did not know they were muscle cells, although NASA surely did see them before painting them over (covering them up to avoid controversy). I have asked many professors of anatomy about the AFM Mars images. Few of them ever saw cells in AFM images. NASA AFM images sometimes show severely distorted/broken cells/ tissues. Anatomy professors are no archaeolgists. They are not used to this kind of "ugly" images. They have to think about their reputation on such important finds. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foolish reporters will tell you this was not a Martian animal andthese were not numerous Martian cells, etc. | Lin Liangtai | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 25th 08 12:32 AM |
Foolish reporters will tell you this was not a Martian animal andthese were not numerous Martian cells, etc. | Lin Liangtai | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 20th 08 12:32 PM |
"Martian Bunnies" covered by NY Times | Pete3 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 16th 04 01:29 AM |