Globular cluster PAL 11 in Aql

On 22 June, 17:22, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote:
You are an astrophotographer with very,very little astronomical sense
of your roots and with very little respect for the efforts which link
the geostatic astronomers of Greece with the great Western astronomers
who's efforts are based on planetary dynamics...blah, blah, blah

The guy posts a link to a great image of a faint and rarely-viewed globular
cluster, and you respond with yet another immense essay of unrelated and
irrelevant drivel. *Amazing.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California

http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-Solar-Sc...nrise-Seas.htm

Pick any Solstice such as the Northern Winter Solstice and the Earth
has spent 6 months orbitally heading in a forward direction and is
now,after the Summer Solstice,is heading in a backward direction
thereby changing the rotational orientation to the Sun.

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...999/11/video/b

Four years spent demonstrating this using actual images of this
additional dynamic in action and not one single affirmation and it
is still described as 'tilt to the orbital plane'.What is it ?,is
there some mental block where people can't make the transition to the
intepretation of planetary dynamics because I find it incredible that
any reasonable person can miss out on basic,basic astronomical
principles,using modern imaging.

There is a guy who just posted that there is no association between
the Equation of Time and the daily cycle and he hasn't a care in the
world as he turns his attention to some other novelty while not
receiving the slightest objection here.He and everyone else can make
up stories at will,if there is no 'absolute time' even though it
constitutes Newton's definition of the Equation of Time,then to hell
with Newton,if Copernicus states variable axial tilt then who
cares,all that matters is what is required to maintain an ability to
say anything ,the ultimate offence against astronomy -

"Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as "the
truth" exists. […] The implied objective of this line of thought is a
nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls
not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such
an event, "It never happened"—well, it never happened. If he says that
two and two are five—well, two and two are five. This prospect
frightens me much more than bombs […]" Orwell

There is some dignity to the distortions of Newton/Flamsteed as they
follow a geometric line of reasoning and even those who tried to find
a way around them over the centuries,after 1905 ,there is nothing but
a free for all and it is showing up today in the ability to unfairly
dump pollution concerns on people by excluding astronomical
qualifiers,a total lack of appreciation for planetary dynamics and
bookended by a 'counter-intuitive' BB theory that is an exclamation
for astrological thinking.

I can't see how the Americans or any other nation of the world would
allow a type of social tyranny foisted upon them as 'climate
change' when the same people cannot handle basic planetary
dynamics,it is that simple and the important.

Pick any Solstice...etc., etc., ad nauseum.

Did you even look at Anthony's image? Did you read his accompanying
comments? Have you bothered to investigate what a Palomar globular is?
Both of your posts (so far) in this thread have been utterly unrelated to
the topic.

BTW, in your earlier post you used "who's" (a contraction of "who is") when
you apparently meant "whose." Apparently grammar isn't your strong suit,
either. That's aside from reading comprehension.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California

On Jun 22, 10:24*pm, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote:
Pick any Solstice...etc., etc., ad nauseum.

Did you even look at Anthony's image? *Did you read his accompanying
comments? *Have you bothered to investigate what a Palomar globular is?
Both of your posts (so far) in this thread have been utterly unrelated to
the topic.

BTW, in your earlier post you used "who's" (a contraction of "who is") when
you apparently meant "whose." *Apparently grammar isn't your strong suit,
either. *That's aside from reading comprehension.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California

The so-called planet 'debate' ended with the belief that people will
eventually get accustomed to 8 planets just as they believe that they
will become accustomed to the term ' global climate change' instead of
what it actually is - pollution. Many people suspect that the grounds
for dumping a global temperature spike on humanity is at best weak
while I know just how reckless that conclusion actually is,and how it
generates a conceptual rut that may be impossible to get out of.

This social tyranny of correlating global temperatures directly with
carbon dioxide levels is toxic from any point of view,but in this
insane world dominated by scientists who can't get basic astronomical
facts for shape and rotation straight,the wider population out of
laziness is swallowing the hyper-fuss.

You are children playing around with magnification equipment and
calling yourselves astronomers but I have yet to meet another one who
can come close to a conversation.

The so-called planet 'debate' ended with the belief that people will
eventually get accustomed to 8 planets...etc.

Whew! How much more irrelevant can you get? There's more "astronomy" in
Anthony's image and data than in all of your accumulated posts. You're a
one-trick pony, and the trick isn't working.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California