![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.space.history David Spain wrote:
If you mean those Delta IV Heavy derivatives, note the notation at the bottom which says 'new pad/infrastructure'. I read that as $$$, worse than 'batteries not included'. Comments? My peanut gallery intuition (such as it is) tends to agree and figures it would become, effectively, Delta V. rick jones -- a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only" these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... ![]() feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA study favors Delta IV/Orion for economy | Pat Flannery | Policy | 7 | June 18th 09 06:17 PM |
Study finds EELV capable of Orion role - Griffin claims alternatives are fiction | Jeff Findley | Policy | 1 | April 24th 09 05:41 AM |
Delta-IV Heavy First Flight Status & Delta-IV Growth Options | Iain Young | Policy | 6 | August 14th 04 09:37 PM |
NASA Exercises Delta II Contract Option For STEREO | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | November 14th 03 11:25 PM |