SPH model describing the "single impact throry" for the Moon

Can't but notice what a total crock of bogus replies you've gotten.
It seems they got you on their taboo NO FLY list.
Perhaps their SPH model isn't what they want anyone to put through any
outside review process. Are you as surprised as I am?

I assume this group is read by a few people who actually know something
about the subject, even fewer who have personal experience with it and a
large group of people who know just enough to post those "bogus" replies.
:-)

I do however realize that I am trying to sit between two chairs here seing
that my hobby astronomy is not quite enough and that the computer science
part in itself will not help me simulate phenomena that I do not fully
understand. My advisor can also generally only advise me on the CS part,
which is the part I need least help with.

On Apr 25, 1:16*am, "Jason Who" wrote:
Can't but notice what a total crock of bogus replies you've gotten.
It seems they got you on their taboo NO FLY list.
Perhaps their SPH model isn't what they want anyone to put through any
outside review process. *Are you as surprised as I am?

I assume this group is read by a few people who actually know something
about the subject, even fewer who have personal experience with it and a
large group of people who know just enough to post those "bogus" replies.
:-)

I do however realize that I am trying to sit between two chairs here seing
that my hobby astronomy is not quite enough and that the computer science
part in itself will not help me simulate phenomena that I do not fully
understand. My advisor can also generally only advise me on the CS part,
which is the part I need least help with.

It's not that a "single impact theory" is outside of the physics box,
at least not any more so than my Selene capture via a lithobraking
encounter theory.

In the public owned domain are several spendy supercomputers that
could easily perform such complex 3D interactive simulations as based
entirely on the known laws of physics. For some reason, those are all
off-limits to outsiders like yourself.

Usenet/newsgroups are worldwide and even somewhat off-world accessible
to most anyone with half a 5th grade educated brain. Unfortunately,
99.9% of Usenet is saturated with brown-nosed clowns in charge of
mainstream and faith based damage-control.

~ BG

In the public owned domain are several spendy supercomputers that
could easily perform such complex 3D interactive simulations as based
entirely on the known laws of physics. For some reason, those are all
off-limits to outsiders like yourself.

It does not really matter that I do not have access to a large super
computer, or operate a botnet ;-)
The probect should only demonstrate to acertain degree the phenomena I am
considering. It is not supposed to break new grounds in astrophysics, so
offline calculation of less than 100k particles will do fine for my purpose.

On Apr 26, 12:01*am, "Jason Who" wrote:
In the public owned domain are several spendy supercomputers that
could easily perform such complex 3D interactive simulations as based
entirely on the known laws of physics. *For some reason, those are all
off-limits to outsiders like yourself.

It does not really matter that I do not have access to a large super
computer, or operate a botnet ;-)
The probect should only demonstrate to acertain degree the phenomena I am
considering. It is not supposed to break new grounds in astrophysics, so
offline calculation of less than 100k particles will do fine for my purpose.

I'm certain that large enough impacts from rogue items do happen, so
good luck with that.

Perhaps the Sanny AI computer can help. Sanny needs exactly this kind
of computing interaction in order to polish up his AI, so you've got
nothing to lose.

~ BG