![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... "jonathan" wrote in message ... Just one month before Bush wins the White House~ Atlanta Inquirer 10-14-2000 NASA, Lockheed Martin Agree On X-33 Plan NASA and Lockheed Martin have agreed on a plan to go forward with the X-33 space plane program, to include aluminum fuel tanks for the vehicle's hydrogen fuel, a revised payment schedule and a target launch date in 2003. The launch date is a contingent on Lockheed Martin's ability to compete and win additional funding under the Space Launch Initiative. NASA and Lockheed believe it is critical to continue work to solve the last remaining barrier to low-cost, reliable access to space. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79131028.html I see no malice by the administration here, only incompetence in picking the most technologically challenging X-33 proposal and actually expecting it to lead to a mature flight prototype. Not malice, militarization. My point is that few here seem to realize how ambitious our military has become with their intended space capabilities. In their own words below, the X-33 and X-37 would give them only a fraction of what they /want/ for future military space operations. "These demonstrators fill only small parts of the flight profiles required to field and operate military space plane." And it's quite clear the Pentagon now considers reusable and low cost to orbit to be a very valuable future military capability. A capability our military should have as soon as possible, but without making it available to adversaries. Meaning secret! The X-33 and X-37 were publicly canceled, but it's clear they were simply taken over by the Pentagon to use the various advances for some other ....far more ambitious....space capability. Some future military space plane. It's not like they make their goals a secret. The X-33 and X-37 dropped off the face of the earth just as they were about to become reality. Amidst an obviously choreographed volley of criticism. The only reason you folks can't see that is because you were here when it happened. Looking back it's rather obvious the programs went black. A few clips from the horses mouth below, which essentially says... "take over X-33, X-37, also the NASA funding for SSO, then cannibalize the technology for the future military space plane" Military Spaceplane (MSP) and Reusable Launch Vehicle Study AF Space Command Space Forces Providing Direct Combat Capabilities to Promote Peace & Stability; Fight & Win Rapid Aerospace Dominance The Conceptual Framework for Employing Aerospace Power in Future Joint Warfighting X-33: Demonstrates Launch Environment Dynamics - Liftoff to Mach 11 (need Mach 15+) - Opportunity to develop operational processes X-37: Demonstrates limited set of Re-Entry Environment Dynamics - Heating and deceleration conditions from orbit to landing - Opportunity to develop refurbishment protocols These demonstrators fill only small parts of the flight profiles required to field and operate military space plane. X-33 and X-37 provide only limited advances in some technologies enabling AFSPC capabilities but would help establish tech needs ..X-33 & X-37 have made significant contributions toward understanding achievable vehicle performance, cost, and integration issues ..will improve system engineering tools and databases ..completion of programs would permit capture of vehicle integration and operations data X-33 Program Assessment Program Plan .. Complete 1 demonstration vehicle .. 7 Flights .. Max. Velocity: Mach 8-11 .. Launch site complete ..Perform an independent assessment of the X-33 and X-37 projects .As an MSP demonstrator .For a specific follow-on program ..NASA and AF need to harmonize space technology investments .Incorporate SLI initiatives and funding http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...k &cd=1&gl=us From...."the last remaining barrier", to "problem plagued" in just four months! Eight million dollars away from a new tank, the 'last barrier', to realizing reusable low cost to orbit, and it just vanishes into thin air. It really was problem plagued. Problems that were mostly solved by the time it was cancelled. Even NASA and Lockheed stated the fuel tank was the "last hurdle". An eight million dollar hurdle??? Not much of a hurdle when we're talking about an important step for a future shuttle replacement. You guys just don't seem to see the military value low cost to orbit can have. Bush/Cheney define the notion of being pro-military industrial complex. Jonathan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA picks Lockheed Martin for moon trip, right choice? | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 06 10:46 PM |
Lockheed Martin HST teams receive NASA honors (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 05 07:28 PM |
Lockheed Martin Receives $178.5 Million NASA Contract Extension | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | August 2nd 04 04:05 PM |
NASA Exercises Lockheed Martin Mission Support Contract Option | Ron | News | 0 | July 28th 04 12:28 AM |