![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently heard that more man-hours went into landing a man on the
moon than any other single endeavour in human history-- in particular, the great pyramid and the great wall of china were cited as requiring far fewer man-hours than the apollo program. If true, I find it very nice that a modern society could mobilize such large resourcesfor such a huge undertaking. But is it true?? Has anyone else heard this claim? Can it really be true? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Computer History Museum Upcoming Events | Eugene Miya | Technology | 0 | July 10th 04 09:02 AM |
Orbit question | Antti Jarvi | Technology | 1 | June 6th 04 09:44 PM |
Weird Question About How Gravity Works | Mick Fin | Policy | 3 | May 10th 04 07:32 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
"Little red schoolhouse" history question (crosspost from s.s.h.) | Gordon | Policy | 13 | October 25th 03 12:54 AM |