![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is yet quite hard to find at least several expert reviews on one of
the 2 new Pentax DSLRs, so behavior at high ISO and long exposure i.e. 5-10-15+ minutes is to me so far unknown. Is it better or worse than the Nikon's D50/D70 or one of the *ist series camera? Is it "improvable" by any means? (I am not discussing the Canon CMOS DSLR's on this issue, everyone interested knows they are the best for this kind of work) The Nikon's workaround for not having the dark frame extracted is, tho' efficient, quite barbaric IMHO. ![]() If I know well, the D80 has the possibility to disable this dark frame extraction feature. Also, from what I've read in the K100D's manual, there is also possible to disable Noise Reduction. If I know wrong, please correct me. How much improvement does that bring, if any? The low price on these cameras, together with the overall kit lens optics, construction and handling quality makes my wish gland drool. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which astro program for Mac OS X? (long) | Larry Stedman | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | April 2nd 04 02:43 PM |
NASA Finds Ocean Water on Mars - Long John Silver's Gives America Free Giant Shrimp To Celebrate | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 25th 04 05:25 PM |
Short versus Long exposures | Stuart M | UK Astronomy | 9 | March 15th 04 01:34 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |