Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion

The oscillation of temperature bands against the fixed axial
orientation of the Earth provides the only accurate view of the
astronomical causes of climate norms.

http://www.climateprediction.net/ima...ges/annual.gif

The oscillation of the bands supersedes hemispherical considerations of
cyclical weather patterns (seasons) and even if seasonal factors can
be acknowledged as a convenience,the purpose of considering climate
norms from astronomical causes is to differentiate it from variations
in temperature band signatures which are due to human social and
industrial activity.

The sheer ugliness of permitting a variable axial tilt to the
Sun/orbital plane * is an incredibly destructive way to approach
climatological influences through the axial and orbital motions of the
Earth notwithstanding that not one single person has made an effort to
correct the situation,astronomically and bottom line.

Radiation is only half the story for climate norms and the behavior of
the temperature bands as they move in accordance with the unique
position of the Earth's position over an annual orbit.The conditioning
of the bands is partly due to the length of time a given latitude
spends in the Earth's orbital shadow and in direct sunlight.As the
Earth's orbital speed varies,the relationship is asymmetrical either
side of the Equinoxes ( Mar/Sept and Sept/Mar) yet nobody has the
slightest concern for this,choosing to split global climate into
ineffective cyclical weather pattern divisions of
spring,summer,fall,winter.

Far more serious than climate imbalances affecting existence for all
life due caused by human activity is the utter disregard for genuine
astronomical insights.The great heliocentric insights based on keeping
the Earth's axial and orbital motions seperate for different purposes
are now lock into a celestial sphere clockwork system that makes it
impossible for genuine investigations into climate norms and
imbalances.

I would have imagined that somebody with a genuine concern for these
devastating short term meteorological events indicating climate
imbalances would have picked up on the difference between explaining
global climate norms through the Earth's axial and orbital motions and
then reducing the data to cyclical meteorological patterns but I am
wrecking my brains trying to figure out why anyone would opt for
explaining hemispherical weather patterns astronomically without any
consideration other than a variable tilting Earth to the Sun/orbital
plane.

In all aspects, and especially the lack of intuitive intelligence,this
is a serious,serious matter and it cannot wait .








*
http://www.scienceu.com/observatory/...s/earthyrb.gif