![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In some respects I not suprize to see it happen. Though the
requirement was a little much for a lunar craft. Bit suprized they dropped the requirement for unpressurized payload deliverly to ISS, but it didn't say anything about deleting the ablity for pressurized payload delivery. http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...s/CEV01126.xml NASA Drops Requirement For Methane Engine From CEV By Frank Morring 01/12/2006 08:38:34 AM Congressional pressure to avoid a gap in U.S. human space access is behind a NASA push to accelerate the first piloted flight of the planned Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). While President Bush originally wanted an operation CEV by 2014, the final RFP for the shuttle replacement called for a first flight with crew "as close to 2010 as possible, but no later than 2012, without compromising safety." The new document also drops requirements for a LOX/methane engine on the CEV service module as a placeholder for future extraction of the fuel from the atmosphere of Mars, and for delivery of unpressurized cargo to the International Space Station, although nothing would prevent the winning team from proposing them, according to a program spokesman at Johnson Space Center. Officially a "call for improvements" to the original CEV bids, the long-awaited document specifies for the first time that the vehicle will be "an improved, blunt-body crew capsule shape" as called for in the exploration architecture released last fall (Aviation Week & Space Technology, Sept. 26, 2005). Final CEV dimensions remain in flux, the program spokesman says. Teams led by Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin are finalists for the job of building the CEV, which will run through 2019. The contract will fall into three parts - a cost-plus award fee element through "approximately 2013" that will cover design, development, test and evaluation (DDT&E) though first flight of the initial two CEV blocks; an indefinite quantity indefinite delivery contract for full-scale CEV production, and a sustaining engineering element that will include "any additional DDT&E necessary to complete development of the Block 2 Lunar variant." Just my $0.02 Space Cadet derwetzelsDASHspacecadetATyahooDOTcom Moon Society - St. Louis Chapter http://www.moonsociety.org/chapters/stlouis/ There is only one (maybe 2) basic core reasons for humans to go beyond LEO, That is for the establishment of space settlements or a space based civilization. Everything else are details. Gary Gray 11/9/2005 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 1 | March 2nd 05 04:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
Scrapping Scram | sanman | Policy | 28 | November 7th 04 06:24 PM |
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 | Nathan Jones | Misc | 20 | November 11th 03 07:33 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |