![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OsherD wrote:
snip As far as I know, no other theory besides Probable Influence (PI) has any explanation for the life acceleration "coincidence". The coincidence may be an example of a Copernicun indication, that because we are viewing phenomena whose explanation is special to us (in this case, special to our era in the universe's lifetime) the explanation is most likely very wrong. This paper makes that argument: http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0404/0404207.pdf The idea is the lack of light curve evidence falsifies the idea of acceleration in the first place. Since this paper came out, I hadn't heard much about it nor any refutations. I cross posted to sci.astro, maybe someone there knows the current status of Jensen's claims. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
There's life out there! | Alfred A. Aburto Jr. | SETI | 0 | March 21st 05 04:15 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | History | 2 | May 22nd 04 02:06 AM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Gas Planets Evolve to be Rock planets??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 114 | October 16th 03 12:51 PM |
Microbe from Depths Takes Life to Hottest Known Limit | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 15th 03 05:01 PM |