![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think a 25% increase in LGP and 12% in resolution IS significant.
What you gain by going from 80mm to 90mm you loose because of the longer focal length and slower focal ratio required for the color correction. If the goal is a widefield view, then the shorter FL is better. Its the difference between a complete split and a figure 8 split on some double stars. This is aperture fever thinking for a scope that is supposed be primarily a widefield scope. What one loses is that large field of view. If small is good, then making smaller bigger is not necessarily better. jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Santa bring in the Orion 80mm ED | Sofjan | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 13th 03 01:27 PM |
Orion 80mm ED--in my hands--tested! | Doug Peterson | Amateur Astronomy | 114 | August 29th 03 06:16 AM |