A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 24th 12, 11:32 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.physics,alt.atheism,sci.astro
Painius[_1_] Painius[_1_] is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,654
Default Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 

On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:43:44 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

}]
Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda?CDM).
He just won't; doesn't want to, I assume.

"Mother Nature" is "The Supreme God": eternal, infinite and perfect.
She consumes fuel (EXergy); so, virtually, She's "alive".
[ : Certainly not limited to biblical times/places.
: in a notional sort of way, like a map, not real. ]

Speaking of God, you belong to tribes/religions of verious sizes.
Had you no "tribe", you'd have no "religion"; they are one and the same.

Randomness is naught but ignorance; so, intrinsically, there is no God,
and nature is at once "nothing" ( 4?D, changeless and choiceless )
and everything ( excluding nothing ).
[ : in reality, despite appearances ]

Humanity labors to breathe, eat, drink and breed.
Nature has hard?wired us this way, it wasn't our doing.
Our "objective" has been fixed by nature, not invented.

Speaking of "objectives", the one word mantra/question, "Target?",
clears away horrid/debilitating/random thoughts.

Mass?Energy = Space?Time , they are one and the same.
Gravity is "EXergy", energy that can do work;
net net (all things considered), it's forever being consumed away.

"Dark Matter" is UNSEEN MASS, "Dark Energy" is EXERGY DEPLETION,
and the start of the Big Bang is just the cosmic horizon,
similar to the event horizon of an ideal black hole.

unLike nature, science is finite; it has a horizon, a limit,
to wit: 13.75 giga?years ago and 46.5 * 2 giga?light?years wide.


I agree that I don't understand the BB. I certainly don't understand
how anybody in their right mind would even remotely accept that there
was a first "time", an initial "time", after which all time and space
just sort of "took off". And "before" which has no meaning. It's
just stupid - royally, unintuitively, and "religiously" stupid.

The Big Bang is a creation myth of science.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to bitch and moan."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
there was no "laser cooling" when the Big Bang was prominent #318Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 January 10th 11 08:56 AM
chapt20 "pi" and "e" explained #216 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 December 24th 09 06:46 AM
chapt20 "pi" and "e" explained #215 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 22nd 09 06:39 AM
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally xszxsz Science 0 October 28th 04 08:54 AM
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relatively" finally xszxsz Research 0 October 27th 04 06:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.