![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One thing about the JWST that disturbed me was the fact that its
mirrors are coated with gold. While at the present time, the infrared is a very exciting area for astronomy, the fact that gold is strongly colored instead of reflecting all colors equally seemed to me to be precluding the use of the telescope for astronomy at other wavelengths. Looking up information about mirror materials, I found out that aluminum and silver are also highly reflective in the infrared; they don't have any limitation in reflectivity there that would prevent them from being used for infrared observations. This seems to make things worse! However, the same source that gave me that information also revealed the *real* reason gold is needed for the JWST. The JWST mirror is to be cooled to very low temperatures to prevent its own emissions of infrared radiation from interfering with observations in the far infrared. Gold has *half* the emissivity of aluminum. Silver wouldn't tarnish in the vacuum of space, but its reflectance has a notch around 310 nanometers where it decreases to 5%. Aluminum, although noticeably less reflective than silver in visible light, is generally 90% reflective all the way out to 220 nanometers in the ultraviolet - which is not true of other materials. While gold, with its yellowish color, has its reflectivity decline within the visible at 540 nanometers or so, the good news is that its reflectivity only declines to about 40% - and stays there right out to 260 nanometers or so. (Copper, with its reddish color, experiences an earlier decline, but retains 40% reflectivity right out to 230 nanometers.) Of course, it isn't just the primary mirror in the JWST that is coated with gold. Also, since the JWST has a segmented mirror, another issue arises - on Earth, observatories can use adaptive optics to compensate for Earth's atmosphere, but with current technology, this works much better in the infrared than in visible light. But since a gold-coated primary, _in itself_, doesn't preclude using the JWST to obtain images in blue, green, and ultraviolet light - the brightness of which can be adjusted to compensate for the lower reflectivity of gold at those wavelengths - if it *can* be designed to avoid being limited to working at wavelengths longer than a limit such as 720 nm or 560 nm, I would think it is worth the effort. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Congress wants to cut JWST | bob haller | Policy | 71 | July 20th 11 07:23 PM |
NASA too afraid to name JWST costs | Kulin Remailer | Policy | 12 | July 18th 11 11:15 PM |
NASA Outsources JWST Launch to Arianespace | Ed Kyle | Policy | 1 | June 19th 07 05:16 AM |
Hubble's replacement - JWST woes | Victor | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 9th 05 06:44 AM |
JWST Deployment Video | Doug Ellison | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 18th 03 04:00 PM |