![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To Derek, Greg and Mary,
I have a technical question I'd like to ask about Virgin Galactic & Scaled Composites that is mostly technical but borders a bit on a question of policy because of a highly speculative assumption behind it. I've speculated here before that I think Branson has an ulterior motive for Virgin Galactic, but I want to open discussion of some of the technical details and challenges behind where I think he'd like to take it with those with aeronautical engineering experience and knowledge. Would a highly speculative technical question be appropriate for sci.space.tech? It really isn't a question about policy, but it surely goes beyond the scope of what is being done or has been done in the past and as far as speculative assumptions go, is pretty brash. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Notice: SST Moderators | Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) | Space Shuttle | 17 | June 21st 09 08:34 PM |
Notice: SST Moderators | Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) | Technology | 11 | June 15th 09 02:20 AM |
William Mook is being given the bum's rush by sci.space.* moderators. Send in your messages of protest. | william mook | Policy | 18 | November 9th 04 01:27 PM |
meta-lesson of the Mars rovers | albright | Science | 6 | March 17th 04 04:13 AM |