A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Research
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Photometry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 08, 08:38 AM posted to sci.astro.research
Steve Willner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,172
Default Photometry

In article , Wolfi
writes:
For near-infrared filters, things get more complicated with the
inclusion of air transmission accounting e.g. for water vapor and the
response functions are shaped quite considerably by the atmosphere.


Which filters do you mean? Most of the practical bands are not too
bad.

However, also in the optical regime the atmosphere has important
contribution (with telluric lines, oxygen molecules etc...). I always
though that such effects are corrected in the published photometry on
night-by-night basis, so that's why filter transmission curves only
are enough to generate synthetic optical magnitudes.


If you want accurate synthetic magnitudes, you have to take the
various bands into account. Yes, published photometry is corrected
at some level on a night-by-night basis but generally to a "standard
star system," which has some average value of atmospheric
transmission, not 100%.

But in the infrared case, the atmospheric contribution must is
included in the filter transmissions published in literature.


Which ones did you have in mind? Most filter curves I've seen don't
include atmospheric transmission. I don't see how it would be
possible, given the differences between sites. Photometry at, say,
Mauna Kea is a lot different than at, say, Kitt Peak.

Is published infrared photometry actually not corrected on
night-by-night basis to eliminate the atmospheric contribution?


There are in practice two corrections. Published photometry is
corrected night-by-night for local extinction. This is usually taken
to be color-independent, though that isn't necessarily the case. In
addition, there are (much smaller) corrections for the different
photometric systems at different observatories. These arise from
slight variations in transmission of filters and other optics as well
as differences in altitude and water vapor content. The latter
corrections are often neglected; they are important only for very
precise work on very red stars or stars with unusual spectral
properties.

If you have specific questions, feel free to contact me by email.

--
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
(Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a
valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial
email may be sent to your ISP.)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photometry Wolfi Research 0 November 21st 08 09:16 AM
Converting old photometry units PrisNo6 Research 0 April 8th 04 10:00 AM
ETX90 and variable photometry Bahjah Misc 1 March 25th 04 09:20 AM
High Speed Photometry Ed Majden Research 0 August 26th 03 11:10 PM
High Speed Photometry Ed Majden Amateur Astronomy 0 August 24th 03 07:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.