![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Folks:
This post is to announce that I'm selling a 6-inch F-15 Jaegers lens on eBay. Here's the link to the auction page. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 David Sleeter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Sleeter wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 .... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Sleeter" wrote in message
... "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! Given the choice between a Jaegers objective and a D&G objective of the same aperture, for the same price, most folks *I* know would choose a D&G EVERY time... Yes, the Jaegers has a certain nostalgic connotation, but when it comes down to optical quality between a D&G and a Jaegers, well... D&G all the way... -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.6 Longitude: -112.3 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IAWTP.
"Jan Owen" wrote in message news:Y5pof.4315$Gv.1668@fed1read06... "David Sleeter" wrote in message ... "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! Given the choice between a Jaegers objective and a D&G objective of the same aperture, for the same price, most folks *I* know would choose a D&G EVERY time... Yes, the Jaegers has a certain nostalgic connotation, but when it comes down to optical quality between a D&G and a Jaegers, well... D&G all the way... -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.6 Longitude: -112.3 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:50:29 -0700, "Jan Owen"
wrote: "David Sleeter" wrote in message ... "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! Given the choice between a Jaegers objective and a D&G objective of the same aperture, for the same price, most folks *I* know would choose a D&G EVERY time... Yes, the Jaegers has a certain nostalgic connotation, but when it comes down to optical quality between a D&G and a Jaegers, well... D&G all the way... Oh, I don't know about that. D&G does make great optics but historically they have been VERY reluctant to tackle good, moderate or faster f/ratio achromatic lenses where Jaeger's has not. I and a few others have certainly heard/known of a few mixed quality reviews of the speedier Jaeger's objectives (in the 6" class particularly) but what I've seen of each of several various examples in all f/ratios was that quality was exceptional in each case! So, ha ha ha! ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete Rasmussen" wrote in message
news ![]() On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:50:29 -0700, "Jan Owen" wrote: "David Sleeter" wrote in message ... "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! Given the choice between a Jaegers objective and a D&G objective of the same aperture, for the same price, most folks *I* know would choose a D&G EVERY time... Yes, the Jaegers has a certain nostalgic connotation, but when it comes down to optical quality between a D&G and a Jaegers, well... D&G all the way... Oh, I don't know about that. D&G does make great optics but historically they have been VERY reluctant to tackle good, moderate or faster f/ratio achromatic lenses where Jaeger's has not. I and a few others have certainly heard/known of a few mixed quality reviews of the speedier Jaeger's objectives (in the 6" class particularly) but what I've seen of each of several various examples in all f/ratios was that quality was exceptional in each case! So, ha ha ha! ;-) I've seen some very good (excellent, actually, though my personal tastes in refractors are more toward apos than achros) Jaegers objectives in telescopes. And I've seen some fair ones. I've never personally seen a BAD one, so I refrained from commentary within that context, and left out the stories that circulate OUTSIDE my personal experience. I would still characterize the overall highest PERCENTAGE of excellent achromatic objectives as likely to come from D&G, though I've certainly seen excellent examples of Jaegers' objectives as well... Perhaps the reason we don't see many D&G scopes with focal ratios below f/12, is because they are committed to producing uniformly high quality objectives consistent with their reputation, and realize that it's not easy to consistently deliver the quality they're committed to at shorter focal ratios, especially in the price range they work within... Regardless, I sure wouldn't buy ANY telescope, or objective, on E-Bay... -- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.6 Longitude: -112.3 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:51:11 -0600, Pete Rasmussen
wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:50:29 -0700, "Jan Owen" wrote: "David Sleeter" wrote in message ... "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... David Sleeter wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7573092651 ... but I can get a 6" objective in cell from D&G optical for the same price ... decisions, decisions ... http://www.dgoptical.com/objective.htm But it isn't a JAEGERS! Given the choice between a Jaegers objective and a D&G objective of the same aperture, for the same price, most folks *I* know would choose a D&G EVERY time... Yes, the Jaegers has a certain nostalgic connotation, but when it comes down to optical quality between a D&G and a Jaegers, well... D&G all the way... Oh, I don't know about that. D&G does make great optics but historically they have been VERY reluctant to tackle good, moderate or faster f/ratio achromatic lenses where Jaeger's has not. I and a few others have certainly heard/known of a few mixed quality reviews of the speedier Jaeger's objectives (in the 6" class particularly) but what I've seen of each of several various examples in all f/ratios was that quality was exceptional in each case! So, ha ha ha! ;-) Honestly, quality matters little in a 6" f5 achromat. Residual SA and horrific CA completely limit magnification so it is nothing but a big rich field scope. You don't need superb quality for that task. -Rich |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
20X100 25x100 Binocular | halfro | Amateur Astronomy | 105 | April 7th 04 09:50 PM |
Tele Vue 76 flip-up lens cap? | Florian | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | March 1st 04 01:35 PM |
Single lens objective refractor | Lurking Luser | Amateur Astronomy | 27 | February 27th 04 09:40 AM |
Apo Lens Re-centering tools | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 19 | July 25th 03 07:58 AM |
Prism Diagonal Anti Chromatic Aberration Effect? | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | July 18th 03 04:25 AM |