![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() According to Kelly Johnson's A-12 Log, on 14 Sept 1960 they started work on a bomber version. This saw light as SP-229, "RB-12 Proposal" on 15 Dec 1960. I believe that Byrnes & Hurley's "Blackbird Rising" mentions this, but I'm away from home and my copy, so I can't check. In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missles), a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers of Crickmore's books?), and a single large bomb in the fuselage. But as an earlier writer has posted, the B-12 was never built in any form. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Jul 2004 09:49:09 -0700, (Paul A. Suhler)
wrote: But as an earlier writer has posted, the B-12 was never built in any form. ....Hey, if you're going to back me up, at least mention me, dammit! :-) :-) :-) OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul A. Suhler wrote: In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missiles), a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers of Crickmore's books?), There are two drawings of that in Miller's "Skunk Works". The bomb bay appears to be located at between 550 and 634 inchs back from the nose of the aircraft, giving the bombs an overall length of around 80 inches, and a diameter of 11 inches (although the drawing looks like it says 71" for diameter, which makes no sense in regards to the diameter of the fuselage shown.) and a single large bomb in the fuselage. That was supposed to be based on the warhead of the Polaris missile. Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:41:27 -0500, Pat Flannery
wrote: Paul A. Suhler wrote: In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missiles), a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers of Crickmore's books?), There are two drawings of that in Miller's "Skunk Works". The bomb bay appears to be located at between 550 and 634 inchs back from the nose of the aircraft, giving the bombs an overall length of around 80 inches, and a diameter of 11 inches (although the drawing looks like it says 71" for diameter, which makes no sense in regards to the diameter of the fuselage shown.) and a single large bomb in the fuselage. That was supposed to be based on the warhead of the Polaris missile. Pat There was also some drawings of one that would carry four SRAMs in the chines (two on each side where the AIM-47s went on the YF-12A) and designed for Mach 3.2 launch. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
Lockheed: In The National Security Interest of America | * | Astronomy Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 06:30 AM |
Ramping Up The Paranoia: Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy | * | Astronomy Misc | 6 | April 13th 04 11:50 PM |
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 1 | October 15th 03 12:21 AM |
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 14th 03 03:31 PM |