![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Peterson wrote:
I received one at work today, will not be able to do a star test till later. It will be interesting to see how "colorful" it is on the Moon or Mars. Phil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Peterson wrote:
I received one at work today, will not be able to do a star test till later. It will be interesting to see how "colorful" it is on the Moon or Mars. Phil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2003 14:35:11 -0700, (Doug
Peterson) wrote: I doubt Takahashi or AP have anything to worry about. I bet you will be found mistaken. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Aug 2003 14:35:11 -0700, (Doug
Peterson) wrote: I doubt Takahashi or AP have anything to worry about. I bet you will be found mistaken. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pete Rasmussen" wrote in message
... On 18 Aug 2003 14:35:11 -0700, (Doug Peterson) wrote: I doubt Takahashi or AP have anything to worry about. I bet you will be found mistaken. Pete, While the Orion ED 80mm may be a nice scope and a good value, it certainly doesn't seem like the mechanics are close to the same league that AP, Tak, and TMB are supplying. I didn't notice anything about hand figuring or interferometric testing either. The market has proven that people are willing to pay for top quality optics and mechanics. While there certainly is a market for scopes like the Orion ED 80mm, I do not think it is the same market the high end companies are selling to. It certainly isn't geared toward the folks doing imaging either. Clear skies, Alan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Orion ED 80mm--in my hands
From: "Alan French" Date: 8/18/03 6:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: Pete, While the Orion ED 80mm may be a nice scope and a good value, it certainly doesn't seem like the mechanics are close to the same league that AP, Tak, and TMB are supplying. I didn't notice anything about hand figuring or interferometric testing either. The market has proven that people are willing to pay for top quality optics and mechanics. While there certainly is a market for scopes like the Orion ED 80mm, I do not think it is the same market the high end companies are selling to. It certainly isn't geared toward the folks doing imaging either. Clear skies, Alan ********************* The ED 80mm would make a nice finder, or a go fast solar scope!!! Chas P. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Orion ED 80mm--in my hands
From: "Alan French" Date: 8/18/03 6:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: Pete, While the Orion ED 80mm may be a nice scope and a good value, it certainly doesn't seem like the mechanics are close to the same league that AP, Tak, and TMB are supplying. I didn't notice anything about hand figuring or interferometric testing either. The market has proven that people are willing to pay for top quality optics and mechanics. While there certainly is a market for scopes like the Orion ED 80mm, I do not think it is the same market the high end companies are selling to. It certainly isn't geared toward the folks doing imaging either. Clear skies, Alan ********************* The ED 80mm would make a nice finder, or a go fast solar scope!!! Chas P. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:56:59 GMT, "Alan French"
wrote: Hi Alan, While the Orion ED 80mm may be a nice scope and a good value, it certainly doesn't seem like the mechanics are close to the same league that AP, Tak, and TMB are supplying. A smooth Crayford is primo. Adjustable cell likely next up? How good does it have to get to adequately grab the attention and a significant piece in a market? Not to mention price that definitely grabs buyers at blinding speed. I didn't notice anything about hand figuring or interferometric testing either. How will that matter that much if the QC risk factor is found reduced for the new model? The market has proven that people are willing to pay for top quality optics and mechanics. That is exactly what they may be getting with this new scope. Or at least to a standard that appeals strongly enough to draw out a significant number of wallets (or purses) from those that could only look otherwise toward long term expenditure for same. After all, the fact remains a vast majority of end users do not have excess amounts to spend for a sweet scope. Hence, the dreams of an APO vs. the actual move toward justifying one in *budget sensible* terms. Please don't take me wrong. I'm not in the least attempting to knock the APO manufacturers saying this stuff. I have the highest of regard toward them and their fantastic productsI I personally feel bad about the way things seem to be going but wish to be realistic all the same. Just look at the achromat scopes, giant binoculars, and to some extent the cheap eyepiece crazes of recent times. I imagine those are big shares of the existing market. While there certainly is a market for scopes like the Orion ED 80mm, I do not think it is the same market the high end companies are selling to. It certainly isn't geared toward the folks doing imaging either. I wish to politely disagree. Sad to say but my hunch is there will be a highly visable crunch at some point in time and that this is the beginning of that change. Clear skies, Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I, for one, wouldn't buy the high priced APOs, but at the Orion prices, I'd be in, especially if the 102mm and 127mm scopes show up. There is a threshold in price where a floodgate of customers would appear. The Orion prices may be the threshold. Among with those customers may be those that would, otherwise have gone to the established APO makers. Al M Pete Rasmussen wrote in message . .. On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 01:56:59 GMT, "Alan French" wrote: Hi Alan, While the Orion ED 80mm may be a nice scope and a good value, it certainly doesn't seem like the mechanics are close to the same league that AP, Tak, and TMB are supplying. A smooth Crayford is primo. Adjustable cell likely next up? How good does it have to get to adequately grab the attention and a significant piece in a market? Not to mention price that definitely grabs buyers at blinding speed. I didn't notice anything about hand figuring or interferometric testing either. How will that matter that much if the QC risk factor is found reduced for the new model? The market has proven that people are willing to pay for top quality optics and mechanics. That is exactly what they may be getting with this new scope. Or at least to a standard that appeals strongly enough to draw out a significant number of wallets (or purses) from those that could only look otherwise toward long term expenditure for same. After all, the fact remains a vast majority of end users do not have excess amounts to spend for a sweet scope. Hence, the dreams of an APO vs. the actual move toward justifying one in *budget sensible* terms. Please don't take me wrong. I'm not in the least attempting to knock the APO manufacturers saying this stuff. I have the highest of regard toward them and their fantastic productsI I personally feel bad about the way things seem to be going but wish to be realistic all the same. Just look at the achromat scopes, giant binoculars, and to some extent the cheap eyepiece crazes of recent times. I imagine those are big shares of the existing market. While there certainly is a market for scopes like the Orion ED 80mm, I do not think it is the same market the high end companies are selling to. It certainly isn't geared toward the folks doing imaging either. I wish to politely disagree. Sad to say but my hunch is there will be a highly visable crunch at some point in time and that this is the beginning of that change. Clear skies, Pete |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Orion prices may be the threshold. Among with those
customers may be those that would, otherwise have gone to the established APO makers. It's also possible that if these new scopes in larger sizes are quite a bit cheaper, that the established APO makers will also back off on things like color correction, spherical correction, number of elements, and mechanical quality to produce a lightweight product in direct competition. This would precipitate a race to the bottom, of course. It will be interesting to see what Synta can do in the 4" to 6" range. Building a color-free 80mm is not anywhere near as hard as a 6"F8 using only 2 elements. Personally, I would have no interest in building such a scope because most of our focus is on multi-use refractors/reflectors for imaging as well as visual, where a solid heavy duty focuser and tube assembly is really of prime importance. If you're not familiar with this end of the market, take a look at the TEC web site and see the focuser that is being built for their refractors by Starlight Instruments. This focuser costs almost twice as much as the entire 80mm Orion tube assembly, and probably weighs twice as much also. Overkill? Hardly, for those who know what they need. Roland Christen |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Proposed Theoretical Adjustments to Project Orion | Diginomics | Policy | 4 | April 21st 04 01:25 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
earth launched buried orion | Parallax | Technology | 0 | October 21st 03 09:10 PM |
A BIG UP TO ORION | Lucy & Howard Albert | Amateur Astronomy | 96 | September 2nd 03 02:13 AM |