![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a FAQ or care to engage in a short Eyepieces 101 thread? I
have an 8'' Harden Optical Dob. I am very fond of the scope. I bought the biggest bucket I could afford, now I would like to learn more about eyepieces, in the hopes of adding to my default set. I don't know where to start. -- BenignVanilla Pond Site: www.darofamily.com/jeff/links/mypond |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
see:
http://www.brayebrookobservatory.org...OLUTIONofEYEPI ECES.pdf You will need to put the entire URL together, and will need a PDF viewer and some time to download this.... Clear, Dark, Steady Skies! (And considerate neighbors!!!) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Foley" wrote in message
... see: http://www.brayebrookobservatory.org...OLUTIONofEYEPI ECES.pdf You will need to put the entire URL together, and will need a PDF viewer and some time to download this.... Clear, Dark, Steady Skies! (And considerate neighbors!!!) Downloading now...thanks for the link. BV. P.S. Your sig reminded me...My neighbor's son is a major gearhead. Last night I had my head stuck to my scope, when I heard the roar of his Mustang. I clinched my eyes shut waiting for his headlights to blind me, as he parks near my curb. The sound of his engine began to roll away, but no light? I opened my eyes to see that he had gotten in his car, and backed down the street with just his parking lights on, in order to not blind me with his headlights, nor backup lights. Thanks for the wish in your sig...it worked. I had both last night. I think I got my first glimpse of M51. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BenignVanilla" wrote in message
... Does anyone have a FAQ or care to engage in a short Eyepieces 101 thread? I have an 8'' Harden Optical Dob. I am very fond of the scope. I bought the biggest bucket I could afford, now I would like to learn more about eyepieces, in the hopes of adding to my default set. I don't know where to start. Short thread on eyepieces? Surely you jest.. :-) Where to start? First some (generalized) definitions: Aperture - the diameter of the telescope's objective lens/mirror (unless intentionally "stopped" down by a mask of some type, where the aperture is then the diameter of the stop). Focal Plane - the point at which all rays coming from the objectve lens/mirror create a representation of the target image. (A "crossing of the beams", so to speak.) Focal Length - the distance light rays must travel to reach the focal plane Focal Ratio - the ratio of a telescope's aperture, to its objective's focal length. Magnification - an ordinal value that indicates the number of times the image at the focal plane is made larger, measured in diameters. Example: 50x means that the image "in" the eyepiece is 50 diameters larger than the image at the focal plane. Apparent field of view (rating for eyepiece) - the field of view you would get on the sky, when (if you could see) looking through an eyepiece without a telescope True field of view - the field of view you get on the sky when the eyepiece is in the telescope. (And, not just any telescope, but a telescope of specific focal length, and all other scopes of same focal length). Eye lens (eyepiece) - the eyepiece lens closest to the eye. Field lens (eyepiece) - the eyepiece lens closest to the telescope's objective lens/mirror. Field stop (eyepiece) - the diameter to which the field lens is restricted by the eyepiece manufacturter Eye relief (eyepiece) - the distance from the eye to the eye lens, where the entire field of view is visible in the eyepiece Exit pupil - the diameter of the light cone at the point where the entire field of view is visible in the eyepiece (the eye relief point), when in the telescope (And, not just any telescope, but a telescope of specific focal ratio, and all other scopes of same focal ratio). Eye pupil - the diameter of your eye's pupil, given the ambient light conditions. Below age 40, consider 7mm to be the maximum, above age 40 consider 5mm to be the maximum, for fully dark adapted eyes. YMMV. The formulae: (1) Magnification = focal length of telescope / focal length of eyepiece (2) Exit pupil = focal length of eyepiece / focal ratio of telescope (3) True field of view = (diameter of eyepiece field stop / focal length of telescope) * 57.3 (3a) True field of view (approx.) = apparent field of view of eyepiece / resultant magnification of eyepiece in a telescope of specific focal length Of primary importance when selecting eyepieces is using the best exit pupil for the job. I think it was David Knisely who posted a short document on useful magnifications, where he lists magnification per inch of aperture, which in turn dictates exit pupil. This list, as well as others, indicate what exit pupils are reasonable for the different objects one views in a telescope. The five steps to selecting an eyepiece: 1) Determine which exit pupils to work with (find the aforementioned documents) 2) Based on your telescopes specifications, determine what focal length eyepieces will give you those exit pupils. 3) Find which currently available eyepieces are closest to those focal lengths. 4) Beg and borrow eyepieces in those focal lengths, but of different designs, and try them 5) Select the ones that you can afford, keeping in mind that a premium widefield eyepiece is worth every penny if you have the money to spare, but that the primary goal is the correct focal length. Final comment: wide field eyepieces are more important in undriven scopes than in driven scopes. Consider the cost of an inexpensive EQ Platform for your Dob when considering eyepieces. I have a set of very expensive wide field eyepieces that I use in my Dob, but there are times when I'd rather have tracking. In particular, the wide field eyepieces are important at low powers, whether the scope is driven or not, as they aid in finding, and can frame some of the larger objects. However, at higher powers, even the wide field eyepieces, leave you with the requirement to nudge your scope along quite frequently. Since high power views are generally aimed at planets and small objects, where a large field of view isn't required, before spending $900 on three higher power wide field eyepieces, consider spending $600 on an EQ Platform, and $300 on three narrow, high quality eyepieces of a simpler design. If those numbers just blew you completely out of the water, in the interim, Plossls are good eyepieces with a 50 degree AFOV. Other than the increased nudging frequency, I still like the actual images in my 13mm, and 6.4mm Plossls, which compare pretty favorably to the Naglers. -- -Stephen Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Awesome thanks!
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... "BenignVanilla" wrote in message ... Does anyone have a FAQ or care to engage in a short Eyepieces 101 thread? I have an 8'' Harden Optical Dob. I am very fond of the scope. I bought the biggest bucket I could afford, now I would like to learn more about eyepieces, in the hopes of adding to my default set. I don't know where to start. Short thread on eyepieces? Surely you jest.. :-) Where to start? First some (generalized) definitions: Aperture - the diameter of the telescope's objective lens/mirror (unless intentionally "stopped" down by a mask of some type, where the aperture is then the diameter of the stop). Focal Plane - the point at which all rays coming from the objectve lens/mirror create a representation of the target image. (A "crossing of the beams", so to speak.) Focal Length - the distance light rays must travel to reach the focal plane Focal Ratio - the ratio of a telescope's aperture, to its objective's focal length. Magnification - an ordinal value that indicates the number of times the image at the focal plane is made larger, measured in diameters. Example: 50x means that the image "in" the eyepiece is 50 diameters larger than the image at the focal plane. Apparent field of view (rating for eyepiece) - the field of view you would get on the sky, when (if you could see) looking through an eyepiece without a telescope True field of view - the field of view you get on the sky when the eyepiece is in the telescope. (And, not just any telescope, but a telescope of specific focal length, and all other scopes of same focal length). Eye lens (eyepiece) - the eyepiece lens closest to the eye. Field lens (eyepiece) - the eyepiece lens closest to the telescope's objective lens/mirror. Field stop (eyepiece) - the diameter to which the field lens is restricted by the eyepiece manufacturter Eye relief (eyepiece) - the distance from the eye to the eye lens, where the entire field of view is visible in the eyepiece Exit pupil - the diameter of the light cone at the point where the entire field of view is visible in the eyepiece (the eye relief point), when in the telescope (And, not just any telescope, but a telescope of specific focal ratio, and all other scopes of same focal ratio). Eye pupil - the diameter of your eye's pupil, given the ambient light conditions. Below age 40, consider 7mm to be the maximum, above age 40 consider 5mm to be the maximum, for fully dark adapted eyes. YMMV. The formulae: (1) Magnification = focal length of telescope / focal length of eyepiece (2) Exit pupil = focal length of eyepiece / focal ratio of telescope (3) True field of view = (diameter of eyepiece field stop / focal length of telescope) * 57.3 (3a) True field of view (approx.) = apparent field of view of eyepiece / resultant magnification of eyepiece in a telescope of specific focal length Of primary importance when selecting eyepieces is using the best exit pupil for the job. I think it was David Knisely who posted a short document on useful magnifications, where he lists magnification per inch of aperture, which in turn dictates exit pupil. This list, as well as others, indicate what exit pupils are reasonable for the different objects one views in a telescope. The five steps to selecting an eyepiece: 1) Determine which exit pupils to work with (find the aforementioned documents) 2) Based on your telescopes specifications, determine what focal length eyepieces will give you those exit pupils. 3) Find which currently available eyepieces are closest to those focal lengths. 4) Beg and borrow eyepieces in those focal lengths, but of different designs, and try them 5) Select the ones that you can afford, keeping in mind that a premium widefield eyepiece is worth every penny if you have the money to spare, but that the primary goal is the correct focal length. Final comment: wide field eyepieces are more important in undriven scopes than in driven scopes. Consider the cost of an inexpensive EQ Platform for your Dob when considering eyepieces. I have a set of very expensive wide field eyepieces that I use in my Dob, but there are times when I'd rather have tracking. In particular, the wide field eyepieces are important at low powers, whether the scope is driven or not, as they aid in finding, and can frame some of the larger objects. However, at higher powers, even the wide field eyepieces, leave you with the requirement to nudge your scope along quite frequently. Since high power views are generally aimed at planets and small objects, where a large field of view isn't required, before spending $900 on three higher power wide field eyepieces, consider spending $600 on an EQ Platform, and $300 on three narrow, high quality eyepieces of a simpler design. If those numbers just blew you completely out of the water, in the interim, Plossls are good eyepieces with a 50 degree AFOV. Other than the increased nudging frequency, I still like the actual images in my 13mm, and 6.4mm Plossls, which compare pretty favorably to the Naglers. -- -Stephen Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a FAQ or care to engage in a short Eyepieces 101 thread? I
have an 8'' Harden Optical Dob. I am very fond of the scope. I bought the biggest bucket I could afford, now I would like to learn more about eyepieces, in the hopes of adding to my default set. I don't know where to start. There are lots of possibilities and options out there. Do some reading, www.cloudynights.com has lots of comparisons and reviews, all of course to be taken with a grain of salt. For someone on something of a budget, I suggest considering the Orion Expanse eyepieces or the similar (identical) eyepieces offered by other vendors. These are 6, 9, 15 and 20 mm 66 degree FOV eyepieces. I have the first three and have been very pleased with them, as sharp in the center as plossls, very acceptable edge performance, I rarely use anything else these days. They do have some ghosting issues but this does not seem to bother me. Prior to acquiring these, I used a variety of decent plossls (Ultima, Parks, and some standard Celestron) and some UO ortho's. The other day (as I have pointed out previously), I was using the 6mm with an Ultima barlow, paracorr with my 10inch brother of your scope and was able to get nice sharp airy disks and diffraction rings, this amounts to about 500X so that eyepiece can't be all bad. I think these make a nice set of eyepieces for use in your 8 inch F6 DOB. Add an Orion Deluxe shorty (on sale) and you have lots of nice possibilities. Certainly you can spend more money and may will want to in the long run, but these seem to do a decent job. jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BV,
My starting array of EP's would consist of a 25mm plossl, a 12.5mm plossl, and a 6mm orthoscopic. The orthoscopic, while offering a smaller FOV, serves up the contrast desired at higher powers. Don't break the bank on the plossls you acquire at this point. . .something in the 50 to 75 dollar price range should offer sufficient performance. Martin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BenignVanilla" wrote in message ... Does anyone have a FAQ or care to engage in a short Eyepieces 101 thread? I have an 8'' Harden Optical Dob. I am very fond of the scope. I bought the biggest bucket I could afford, now I would like to learn more about eyepieces, in the hopes of adding to my default set. I don't know where to start. I'm also a newbie and owner of the 8" Hardin dob. Trying to figure which ep's to buy is as hard as figuring out which first scope to buy. It's enough to drive you batty. I have purchased 2 ep's and the Orion Shorty + 2x Barlow. I picked up the BW Optiks 2" 80 degree ep. I also got the UO Konig 16mm 65degree ep. My thinking is I'll start with the wider FOV ep's to make it easier to locate those hard to find objects. My next plan of attack is to make a list of other ep's I'm interested in and take the list to my next starparty. The Orion expanse, OU Orthos and meade 4000's to name a few. I'm going to try out as many of these I can, and see what works for me. Mike -- BenignVanilla Pond Site: www.darofamily.com/jeff/links/mypond |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Three newbie questions | Mike Walker | Space Shuttle | 31 | September 5th 03 09:04 AM |
Newbie Seeks Red Shift data | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 7 | September 4th 03 01:57 PM |
Newbie query: _How_ is the shuttle roll manoeuvre performed? | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 5 | August 29th 03 06:40 PM |
Comparison of two budget 2" low power eyepieces | Florian | Amateur Astronomy | 29 | July 25th 03 08:11 PM |