![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Interesting,.. very interesting that you should raise this issue. The *effect* of gravitation still does travel at the speed of light, and the gravitic charge is still instantaneous. So both GR and Newton are in alliance on this issue, well, sort of. You might wanta clarify a bit, Paine. What you're terming the "effect of gravitation" would be those yet-undetected distrubances propagating at c, ie., "gravitational waves". GR's belief that gravity itself propagates at c is just plain wrong, as stated previously. Whereas 'speed of charge' is indeed instantaneous. The Fomalont-Kopeikin experiment purporting to 'prove' gravity propagates at c was in reality just a roundabout way of measuring the speed of light. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc My theory on gravity has always been gravitation works without
waves,and has no field.I use the graviton. I see the graviton only as a particle(Higgs). After 62 years nothing has changed my thinking. Keep in mind much money and lab. time has been spent to try to prove my thinking is wrong. Trebert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Attractive Proposition - | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 15 | January 15th 09 05:51 AM |
An Attractive Proposition | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | December 26th 08 09:01 PM |
An Attractive Proposition - | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 1 | December 22nd 08 08:04 PM |
An Attractive Proposition | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | December 22nd 08 06:07 PM |
An Attractive Proposition | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | December 22nd 08 05:21 PM |