What if (on the Nuclear Force)

Well we set off H-bombs and measured their colossal energy. We know what
power the Cern needs to over come the binding force the gluons have in
holding quarks together even with their like positive charge that should
make them repel each other. To add to this strong force it is the only
force that gets stronger with distance. (why?) A force getting
stronger with greater distance goes against GR. Could such a gluon
force exist inside a black hole? Could only quarks be strong enough to
exists under such great gravity pressure? I can relate this to neutron
stars where only neutrons are its interior. Well best to realize GR
does not work in the micro realm. best to realize gravity created the
other three forces. Best to realize we can't relate macro's weak gravity
to the micro fantastic gravity force bert

On Jul 14, 5:49 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Well we set off H-bombs and measured their colossal energy. We know what
power the Cern needs to over come the binding force the gluons have in
holding quarks together even with their like positive charge that should
make them repel each other. To add to this strong force it is the only
force that gets stronger with distance. (why?)


Rubber bands do. Springs do.


A force getting
stronger with greater distance goes against GR. Could such a gluon
force exist inside a black hole? Could only quarks be strong enough to
exists under such great gravity pressure? I can relate this to neutron
stars where only neutrons are its interior. Well best to realize GR
does not work in the micro realm. best to realize gravity created the
other three forces. Best to realize we can't relate macro's weak gravity
to the micro fantastic gravity force bert


If gravity is so weak, how does it overcome all the other forces in
the end?

Double-A

On Jul 14, 12:37 pm, Double-A wrote:

If gravity is so weak, how does it overcome all the other forces in
the end?

Yeah, like in the collapse of a BH.
oc

Double-A Rubber bands rubber sheets,how about boomerangs? I like
boomerangs. Other forces can balance each other out.
Gravity does not have this counter reaction. bert

On Jul 14, 2:04 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

Other forces can balance each other out.

Gravity does not have this counter reaction.

Sure it does. The Big Bang itself.

Gravitation and the BB constitute a natural dipole sharing a common
'ground state'. Whether you view it as a cyclical, 'oscillating'
process as Henry Warren does (see- www.olypen.com/hcwarren/ ), or as
the Continuous Big Bang of Wolter's model, gravitation and the BB are
starkly apparent as two sides of the same coin.

What 'ground state' does the stuff of space erupt from in the Big
Bang? What 'ground state' does the stuff of space 'go to' in the
process of gravitation? Logic and Occam's Razor would dictate that
it's the *same* nonlocal domain/state common to both.

BTW, one thing Wolter brought to the table was emphasis on the
enormous
hydrodynamic pressure of the spatial medium, sufficient to drive the
flow of space into the core of every atomic nucleus. With that in
mind, try to conceptualize the pressurization that compacts the primal
entity that erupts as the BB (and perpetually powers the Continuous
BB). oc

oc Should I have said locally gravity only attracts? My own convex
theory only kicks in very noticeable about 8 billion LY out. Feeling the
pressure on my ass sitting here typing this is keeping me from seeing
the overall picture. bert