![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hope this discussion has not already been here, if so humor me. Here
in the US, from Orion, a newtonian telescope is being sold, a 91mm clear aperture newtonion reflector. For about $900.00 right now. My question is, are any of you familiar with it? Is anyone else making them? Perhaps larger ones? This seems to be a very good innovation. Can amnone comment on this? The claim is that they are as good as apo's which would sell for much more, due to the lack of chromatic abberration, since the off-axis mirror points the light off to the side, eliminating the need for the secondary mirror. If this is really so much better will we soon be seeing larger apertures made this way? Thank you. Sincerely, Bill. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Kelly" wrote:
I hope this discussion has not already been here, if so humor me. Here in the US, from Orion, a newtonian telescope is being sold, a 91mm clear aperture newtonion reflector. For about $900.00 right now. My question is, are any of you familiar with it? Is anyone else making them? Perhaps larger ones? This seems to be a very good innovation. Can amnone comment on this? The claim is that they are as good as apo's which would sell for much more, due to the lack of chromatic abberration, since the off-axis mirror points the light off to the side, eliminating the need for the secondary mirror. If this is really so much better will we soon be seeing larger apertures made this way? Off-axis newtonians aren't new, but they are larger and more complex (expensive) to make than regular newtonians so haven't really taken off in large sizes. The mirror is (or should be) an off-axis section of a paraboloid mirror. This is hard (expensive) to figure alone, it's easier to cut multiple sections from a large mirror. Newtonians may not have any chromatic aberration, but they do suffer from off-axis coma. As the mirror in a clear-aperture newtonian is an off-axis section coma is worse. You can minimise this with a larger focal ratio (f/ratio), but for larger apertures you start needing very long tubes and sections from huge mirrors. I don't know how good the 91mm Orion is, but I bet they won't be bringing out a 200mm. I doubt the 91mm newt is streets ahead of the 80mm or 100mm Orion ED refractors which sit either side on price. Tim -- This is not my helicopter. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Auton" wrote in message ... "Bill Kelly" wrote: I hope this discussion has not already been here, if so humor me. Here in the US, from Orion, a newtonian telescope is being sold, a 91mm clear aperture newtonion reflector. For about $900.00 right now. My question is, are any of you familiar with it? Is anyone else making them? Perhaps larger ones? This seems to be a very good innovation. Can amnone comment on this? The claim is that they are as good as apo's which would sell for much more, due to the lack of chromatic abberration, since the off-axis mirror points the light off to the side, eliminating the need for the secondary mirror. If this is really so much better will we soon be seeing larger apertures made this way? Off-axis newtonians aren't new, but they are larger and more complex (expensive) to make than regular newtonians so haven't really taken off in large sizes. The mirror is (or should be) an off-axis section of a paraboloid mirror. This is hard (expensive) to figure alone, it's easier to cut multiple sections from a large mirror. Newtonians may not have any chromatic aberration, but they do suffer from off-axis coma. As the mirror in a clear-aperture newtonian is an off-axis section coma is worse. You can minimise this with a larger focal ratio (f/ratio), but for larger apertures you start needing very long tubes and sections from huge mirrors. I don't know how good the 91mm Orion is, but I bet they won't be bringing out a 200mm. I doubt the 91mm newt is streets ahead of the 80mm or 100mm Orion ED refractors which sit either side on price. Tim -- This is not my helicopter. Thank you, Tim. There had to be a reason why they haven't become extremely popular fast. I suppose for those who aren't interested in a really large light gathering capability they may be a good option, unless, as you suspect, they aren't much better than a reasonably priced ED glass refractor of similar size. God bless, Bill. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It took me while to find it, but off-axis reflectors are a minority
sport for ATMs. The Schiefspiegler or Kutterscope is a typical off-axis reflector, and at long focal lengths can use spherical mirrors and has perfect colour. But at large apertures they become more difficult to make. Seem to have been very popular in Germany and Holland (where i first came across them). I would recommend a look at Dave Stevick's excellent Weird Telescopes page for more info about off axis reflectors. http://bhs.broo.k12.wv.us/homepage/a...vick/weird.htm And good software if you want to design your own. Enjoy, Callum |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Cooke Triplet: Answering Another of My Own Silly Apochromat Questions | Chris1011 | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | December 5th 04 06:47 AM |
Tasco objective | Ioannis | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 3rd 04 09:08 PM |
20X100 25x100 Binocular | halfro | Amateur Astronomy | 105 | April 7th 04 09:50 PM |
Replacement Meade 395 objective | dick lucas | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | April 6th 04 06:03 AM |