![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Combined reply to two postings below:
"Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... "Grimble Gromble" wrote in message ... "Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... It would have come out so much nicer with an equatorial wedge ;-) Not forgotten. Things are extremely hectic at work at the moment so I haven't bothered my boss with it again (he does actually do work which is unusual for a director - in fact, if we come up with a suitable design, he'll be doing most of the machining). When I broached the idea with him first, a while ago now, he said, as predicted, "No, you don't want to do it like that...". I think I mentioned that he decided he would want to be able to make adjustments even though I was looking to avoid that and the rather considerable extra cost. I've come up with a very basic (but cunning) idea of how to approach the mounting of the telescope on a wedge, and am contemplating a couple of ideas regarding the adjustment. I'm a slow thinker but it's coming. Give us a few more months... Grim No Probs, just having a dig. There'll be plenty of toys arriving during the week to play with for a little while. Have you done a comparison with an existing wedge? I've not seen one in the flesh yet. I'm over to the States in about four weeks for Xmas and the new year and will probably have a look around while there. Thanks, Chris. I've seen pictures of the wedges for the LX90 and LX200. Unfortunately, I don't think there's much to be learned from them. The main stumbling block I have at the moment is more to do with nervousness about securing the telescope to the tripod. It doesn't worry me so much as I think it would trouble other users. The basic idea is to mount the telescope on a triangular plate which would have a ball at one corner (to provide a basic reference point), a cylinder at the second corner (to define an axis in conjunction with the reference point) and just the plate at the third corner (to define a plane in conjunction with the axis). This plate, with attached telescope, would simply lift off the wedge which would have a matching socket for the ball, a groove for the cylinder and a screw (for adjustment? - see reply to Colin) to support the third corner of the plate. What might trouble other users is that this will leave the telescope resting on the wedge rather than being firmly attached to the wedge and thence to the tripod. For myself, this wouldn't be a cause for concern as the weight of the telescope is not inconsiderable and I suspect anything that might jar the telescope and plate out of the wedge, might also knock over the tripod anyway. It's just that if the worst happens, it will be easy for users to point at the design and criticise that instead of whatever clobbered it. Trouble is, providing secure(r) fixing points will add to the cost and I don't want to do that unnecessarily. Perhaps when I've dealt with the wedge itself in more detail, something will suggest itself. Perhaps some simple clamps to secure the plate to the wedge, in case someone wants to use them, will suffice? I've some simple ideas regarding that too. "Colin Dawson" wrote in message ... I've been thinking a little about your wedge idea. Something that you should really consider is that adding the wedge to the tripod will reduce the stability of the mount. In a nutshell, when I used to use my LX90 in Alt Az mode, it was extremely stable a light breeze wouldn't effect the scope, and any wobbles would dampen out is a couple of seconds. Since the addition of the wedge, it takes ages (over 10 seconds) for wobbles to dampen out. It's more suseptable to light winds. Basically the wedge recudes the effectiveness of the original mount. Another problem, specific to the LX90 is that I needed to attach an adapter plate to the OTA in order to fix the scope to the wedge. The plate itself isn't a problem, in fact I highly recommend them, as it does mean that the single bolt thread in the base of the OTA is not getting worn down, and there's no threat of cross threading. The problem is that as the plate is in place, I can't use the scope in Alt-Az mode without removing the plate (which I don't want to do) It would be fantastic, if I could get a device that would allow me to attach me scope to the tripod in Alt-Az mode. What, I'm thinking of is a plate that attachs to the the top of the tripod, using the existing bolt. Around the edge a few (at least 5) pillars that suppose an upper ring/ platform. The upper platform, will look similar to the part of the wedge that the OTA attaches to, complete with the holes necessary to bold the OTA to this platform. Since this is something that wedge owners would want, you won't need to supply the LX90 Wedge Adapter plate, or the bolts needed to attach the OTA, as the owner's already got them. If it's engineered properly, there's no reason why the scope shouldn't be as stable as if the OTA was attached directly to the tripod. To open up the market more, you could sell the adapeter plate and bolt set needed to upgrade an existing Alt-Az mode into the raised configuration. (The marketing principal, is that it stops thread wear on the base of the OTA). Thanks for your comments too, Colin. With regard to your own issues, I have considered the possibility of splitting the wedge into 2 pieces. One piece would be a plate that would bolt to the top of the tripod and on which the plate attached to the telescope would rest in the absence of a wedge for use in alt-az mode. The second piece would become the wedge itself and would then be inserted between the telescope plate and the tripod plate for use in ra-dec mode. This would introduce further work and expense into the project. However, since the same interface would be used between the telescope plate/wedge as between the wedge/tripod plate, there are some economies of scale to be made here. Why the telescopes and tripods couldn't have been designed with this in mind in the first place (thereby obviating the need for two plates as well as a wedge) ... Another advantage of doing it this way would be that any adjustment could be incorporated into the tripod plate making the wedge and telescope plate comparatively simple to manufacture. Grim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Warning possible ebay scam...(on LX90) | vic20owner | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | September 17th 04 05:26 PM |
Help LX90 Autostar quirk | Darrell M | UK Astronomy | 2 | November 16th 03 05:05 PM |
GOTO On Altaz LX90 - Why Not GTO On A Dob??? | Photoking | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 10th 03 03:44 AM |
How good is an Lx90? | chris CLARK | UK Astronomy | 4 | August 21st 03 07:17 PM |