![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
The formula implies that frequency shifts are caused by (A) speed-of-light shifts. (B) wavelength shifts. In 1905 Einstein established (B). If the speed of light is constant as per Einstein, then any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift, which is an obvious idiocy. The metastases of the idiocy eventually killed fundamental physics (converted it into an insane ideology). Resurrected (Einstein-free) physics will be based on (A). In the next version of fundamental physics the original malignancy, Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom "The speed of light is constant" will be replaced with the correct axiom "For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is constant". I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Einstein's false, even nonsensical constancy of the speed of light is the "my precious" of any Einsteinian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz-8CSa9xj8 Einsteinians clearly see that the frequency and the speed of the light pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE but believe that only the frequency varies - the speed of the pulses gloriously remains constant. Ignatius of Loyola explains: "We should always be prepared so as never to err to believe that what I see as white is black, if the hierarchical Church defines it thus." See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obviously variable (Newtonian) speed of light:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE The speed of the light pulses as measured by the stationary observer is c = df where d is the distance between the pulses and f is the frequency measured by the stationary observer. The speed of the pulses as measured by the moving observer is c'= df' c where f' f is the frequency measured by the moving observer. More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fundamental Physics as Ideology | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 7th 19 06:45 AM |
Fundamental Physics Reconciles 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 17th 18 08:04 AM |
How Fundamental Physics Became an Ideology | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 18 11:11 AM |
FUNDAMENTAL PHANTASMS IN PHYSICS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | April 6th 13 07:48 AM |
Physics is fundamental wrong | Sarah Schwartz | Astronomy Misc | 134 | June 27th 04 02:16 AM |