![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have two new Naglers, 7mm and 9mm. Is there anyone out there with
these two eyepieces who can see the entire field of view, right out to the edges, all the way around, without plastering their eyeball right against the eye lens? Do these eyepieces really have 0mm of eye relief? Do the manufacturers of 80-degree eyepieces have a new definition of eye relief? Thanks! Larry Brown http://home.fuse.net/astronomy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Brown wrote: I have two new Naglers, 7mm and 9mm. Is there anyone out there with these two eyepieces who can see the entire field of view, right out to the edges, all the way around, without plastering their eyeball right against the eye lens? Do these eyepieces really have 0mm of eye relief? Do the manufacturers of 80-degree eyepieces have a new definition of eye relief? Thanks! Larry Brown http://home.fuse.net/astronomy I have the Nagle 7 and 9mm, and I also can't see the entire field of view, particularly through the 7mm, unless I'm almost touching the lense. However, to me, the slight movement of the head needed to get the entire view is not a big deal. Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jimcate wrote:
Larry Brown wrote: I have two new Naglers, 7mm and 9mm. Is there anyone out there with these two eyepieces who can see the entire field of view, right out to the edges, all the way around, without plastering their eyeball right against the eye lens? Do these eyepieces really have 0mm of eye relief? Do the manufacturers of 80-degree eyepieces have a new definition of eye relief? Thanks! Larry Brown http://home.fuse.net/astronomy I have the Nagle 7 and 9mm, and I also can't see the entire field of view, particularly through the 7mm, unless I'm almost touching the lense. However, to me, the slight movement of the head needed to get the entire view is not a big deal. Moving the head enhances the feeling of looking through a "porthole." I like it - but then it's all new to me, and I like everything; Maybe it'll get old after awhile. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Brown wrote in message ...
Do the manufacturers of 80-degree eyepieces have a new definition of eye relief? Thanks! Eye relief is a technical term which assumes an idealized model of the eye. It is a well-known fact that the human eye does *not* behave like this idealized model, so that in practice your eye *always* needs to be closer than the stated eye relief in order to see the whole field. I get the following explanation straight from Al Nagler. The reason is that as you slew your eye towards the corner of the field, the pupil moves laterally, away from the center of the eyepiece. If you slew 40 degrees to look directly at the field stop of a Nagler, your pupil moves several millimeters, and when the eye relief is small, that amount of motion may cause the image to black out entirely. Personally, I have considerable trouble seeing the field stop in *any* Televue eyepiece, and have never even come close with a Nagler. Granted, I have never looked through a 32mm Nagler, which is where the field stop is most likely to be visible. Therefore, I find the useful FOV of most Naglers to be *smaller* than in my Pentax XL eyepieces, with their 65-degree AFOV and 20mm eye relief. Moreover, I find the inability to see the field stop extremely vexatious in its own right, since I routinely use it as a reference point when estimating sizes, and also to place bright stars out of the field when viewing faint objects. - Tony Flanders |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spell it
R O L A I D S Clear, Dark, Steady Skies! (And considerate neighbors!!!) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Design Shenzhou program objectives | G.Beat | History | 12 | October 25th 03 10:23 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |