![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, I am shopping for a new telescope, one possibility is the 10''
Orion dobsonian reflector, my budget is 1,000. But now I see at astronomics.com a scope normally costing 2400 on sale for 1200, i would stretch the budget if you guys think this particular scope is a big improvement on the Orion 10'' dob, i am particulary interested in deep sky Celestron - C8S-GT Advanced Series 8" f/10 computerized go-to Schmidt-Cassegrain That is the scope, this is the web address http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...e%5Fid=1&vid=4 Thanks again for your help |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 10" will show you more, the 8" will be more compact, and has tracking. If
you are looking for optical performance, the 10" is the way to go. The 8" will make a nice observing package though. In that price range I would be tempted to pick up an LX90, or a used lx200. Clear Skies Richard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 10" will show you more, the 8" will be more compact, and has tracking. If
you are looking for optical performance, the 10" is the way to go. The 8" will make a nice observing package though. In that price range I would be tempted to pick up an LX90, or a used lx200. Clear Skies Richard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon Gekko IDCC on the Nasdaq" wrote in message om... Ok, I am shopping for a new telescope, one possibility is the 10'' Orion dobsonian reflector, my budget is 1,000. But now I see at astronomics.com a scope normally costing 2400 on sale for 1200, i would stretch the budget if you guys think this particular scope is a big improvement on the Orion 10'' dob, i am particulary interested in deep sky Celestron - C8S-GT Advanced Series 8" f/10 computerized go-to Schmidt-Cassegrain That is the scope, this is the web address http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...e%5Fid=1&vid=4 Thanks again for your help The C8s-GT is a 8" SCT on a CG5 mount with GOTO. If you want portability, GOTO, tracking, reasonable aperture on a dressed up CG5 mount, I would advise you go with the C8S. This scope has _many_ features you will never find on a Dob, but some guys like a very simple telescope completely devoid of any electronics (I'm not one of them). So if $1,200 is your absolute limit, go for it...otherwise, add a few hundred and buy a Meade LX90. Al |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon Gekko IDCC on the Nasdaq" wrote in message om... Ok, I am shopping for a new telescope, one possibility is the 10'' Orion dobsonian reflector, my budget is 1,000. But now I see at astronomics.com a scope normally costing 2400 on sale for 1200, i would stretch the budget if you guys think this particular scope is a big improvement on the Orion 10'' dob, i am particulary interested in deep sky Celestron - C8S-GT Advanced Series 8" f/10 computerized go-to Schmidt-Cassegrain That is the scope, this is the web address http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...e%5Fid=1&vid=4 Thanks again for your help The C8s-GT is a 8" SCT on a CG5 mount with GOTO. If you want portability, GOTO, tracking, reasonable aperture on a dressed up CG5 mount, I would advise you go with the C8S. This scope has _many_ features you will never find on a Dob, but some guys like a very simple telescope completely devoid of any electronics (I'm not one of them). So if $1,200 is your absolute limit, go for it...otherwise, add a few hundred and buy a Meade LX90. Al |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon Gekko IDCC on the Nasdaq" wrote in message om... Ok, I am shopping for a new telescope, one possibility is the 10'' Orion dobsonian reflector, my budget is 1,000. But now I see at astronomics.com a scope normally costing 2400 on sale for 1200, i would stretch the budget if you guys think this particular scope is a big improvement on the Orion 10'' dob, i am particulary interested in deep sky Celestron - C8S-GT Advanced Series 8" f/10 computerized go-to Schmidt-Cassegrain That is the scope, this is the web address http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...e%5Fid=1&vid=4 Thanks again for your help Wonderful deal, but if you are a visual observer (that is, you are not an astrophotographer) then the best deep sky performance will come from the larger (and faster) aperture dob. You said you were particularly interested in deep sky, and that's what I'm recommending. I own a C-8 and have owned a 10" newt of similar performance to the Orion. No question, the newt (dob) blows the C-8 out of the parking lot visually. If you were particularly interested in planetary observing or deep sky astrophotography, I'd have recommended the C-8. Visually, it's weak on deep sky compared to the 10". Regards, Etok __________________________________________________ ____________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gordon Gekko IDCC on the Nasdaq" wrote in message om... Ok, I am shopping for a new telescope, one possibility is the 10'' Orion dobsonian reflector, my budget is 1,000. But now I see at astronomics.com a scope normally costing 2400 on sale for 1200, i would stretch the budget if you guys think this particular scope is a big improvement on the Orion 10'' dob, i am particulary interested in deep sky Celestron - C8S-GT Advanced Series 8" f/10 computerized go-to Schmidt-Cassegrain That is the scope, this is the web address http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...e%5Fid=1&vid=4 Thanks again for your help Wonderful deal, but if you are a visual observer (that is, you are not an astrophotographer) then the best deep sky performance will come from the larger (and faster) aperture dob. You said you were particularly interested in deep sky, and that's what I'm recommending. I own a C-8 and have owned a 10" newt of similar performance to the Orion. No question, the newt (dob) blows the C-8 out of the parking lot visually. If you were particularly interested in planetary observing or deep sky astrophotography, I'd have recommended the C-8. Visually, it's weak on deep sky compared to the 10". Regards, Etok __________________________________________________ ____________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you were particularly interested in planetary observing or deep sky
astrophotography, I'd have recommended the C-8. Visually, it's weak on deep sky compared to the 10". Regards, Etok Thanks Etok, but will I lose a lot with the planets if i go with the Dob, because I do want the better deep sky, but i am also into the planets and don't want to lose too much Also the Dob is 650 while the other is 1299 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you were particularly interested in planetary observing or deep sky
astrophotography, I'd have recommended the C-8. Visually, it's weak on deep sky compared to the 10". Regards, Etok Thanks Etok, but will I lose a lot with the planets if i go with the Dob, because I do want the better deep sky, but i am also into the planets and don't want to lose too much Also the Dob is 650 while the other is 1299 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks Etok, but will I lose a lot with the planets if i go with the Dob, because I do want the better deep sky, but i am also into the planets and don't want to lose too much A 10 inch DOB will do a nice job on the planets. Optically it is likely to be a better performer, given the added aperture and smaller central obstruction. Deep sky the added aperture is definitely a plus. But the issue here is tracking. The lack of tracking on the DOB means that you will have to track the planet yourself, I find this is not a problem, but that is my choice. Each person has different priorities, different goals. If you are like me, like simplicity, quick setup, lack of added gadgets required, the DOB will be the right solution. My suggestion is to try to find the opportunity to look at these scope in person, try them out, see what appeals to you and what doesn't. Check out the issues with setting up the scope, see what hand tracking is like, star hopping vs goto, seated vs standing viewing..... Those catalogs paint some pretty pictures and have some flowery sounding prose that can make an old hat this game get excited about some telescope or eyepiece only to realize, "Hey I had one of those and I really did not like it." So, try to get a feel for what you will be getting before you get it, see what reality is vs the dream. When those boxes show up on your door step, that is not the time to find out how big a 10 inch DOB is or what happens to your neck when viewing at certain angles..... I also suggest considering the 8 inch F6 dob. The optical tubes on these weigh about 22 lbs rather than the 35 lbs of the 10 inch, fit in a car better and still provide stunning views of the deep sky. If this is your first scope, this is a good place to start IMHO. www.hardinoptical.com jon isaacs |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Celestron C6-R Question | Wendy | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | August 21st 03 02:52 PM |
Maksutov Cassegrain question | Roger Hamlett | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 29th 03 07:09 PM |