![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Too bad the whole truth and nothing but the truth in this case is
wisely taking the fifth. I can see that our official Usenet/newsgroup topic banishment policy is running at full tilt, whereas in this case Big Energy and our soon to be unplugged NASA are in some kind of mutual cahoots with one another. ~ BG On Feb 15, 11:27*am, BradGuth wrote: For example: Earth surface area = 5.1e14 m2, and its atmosphere contains * * Helium (He) 5.24 ppmv (0.000524%), He = .1786 kg/m3 Hydrogen (H2) 0.55 ppmv (0.000055%), H2 = .0899 kg/m3 We seem to know more about the perpetual loss/sec of hydrogen and helium for planets (including a few exoplanets) other than Earth. *http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/~gilda/extrass.html At 0.55 ppmv, in order that our atmosphere sustain that average H2 saturation, at any given moment there’s 25e6 kg of hydrogen getting made available and unavoidably migrating upwards and away from Earth’s surface in order to create and sustain the average 0.55 ppmv. *The question is, at what average vertical escapement velocity or volumetric/sec exit away from Earth? Is our hydrogen escapement worth merely 25e6 kg per day = 9.125e6 tonnes/yr, or is it as great as 25e6 kg per hour = 219e6 tonnes/year? Like the GP-B fiasco, at best our EUVE (Extreme Ultra Violet Explorer) could have been representing a false positive, all be its observationology given a nifty eye-candy yellow and reddish colorized UV image of Earth’s surrounding cloud of helium and hydrogen. However, the solar wind caused planetary exhaust trail of H2 and He is what needs to be more closely looked at and objectively quantified, as most easily accomplished from our Selene/moon or from it's L1 that we still do not have. Existing UV and IR imaging: *http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/docs/rst/Sect20/A3.html The badly failing magnetosphere has been capable of restraining or mildly sequestering some of Earth's hydrogen and helium by way of having been protecting our atmosphere, but unfortunately for the past 2000 years this too is going away (most recently at -.05%/year or even –120 nT/yr), is perhaps as good of reason why that lofty cloud of hydrogen and helium isn't sticking around, and why the lethal SAA contour has been exponentially growing and nearing the surface. *On the other hand, care to imagine what could happen if such terrestrial hydrogen and helium didn’t leak away? *http://io9.com/395272/is-earths-magn...eld-failing-us *http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.co.../geomagnetism/ Of course our perpetual naysayers and usual evidence excluding gauntlet of our resident Usenet/newsgroup wizards and brown-nosed clowns are not paying serious attention, or allowing any context of consideration as to the worth or consequences of our badly failing geomagnetic force and of its subsequent magnetosphere. *It’s as though our best physics and/or objective science doesn’t hardly matter, unless it’s strictly interpreted in order to sustain their mainstream status quo. *In other words, for sustaining our mainstream as a viable cabal of happy campers, apparently our best public funded science is but worth used toilet paper. I recall mentioning at least a few thousand times, about our having the Selene L1 platform of science instruments easily established as of 4 decades ago, including many UV and IR imaging cameras looking at Earth and equally at our Selene/moon that's losing it's sodium and a few other elements at an alarming rate. *However, without our having such a nifty perspective it's simply much harder if not nearly impossible to interpret whatever's going on. btw, *the often bogus mindset of "I always had the thoughts that free hydrogen, and helium were lost in space and that Earth's gravity was not strong enough to hold it" isn't what I'd gotten out of those previously posted comments. *In fact, it's pretty much the opposite of what we’ve typically heard from most others, insisting that supposedly Earth never loses mass, whereas instead I was the first in this or any other Usenet/newsgroup to insist that our moon and Earth have each been losing mass, and implying that the modern day human race has been artificially assisting in this natural process. Perhaps this can also explain as to why ETs would bother going to all the trouble of extracting minerals and raw elements from another planet or moon, such as our dire need of extracting He3 from our Selene/moon, or that of whomever is taking substances away from Venus. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BradGuth" wrote:
:::: BradGuth wrote: hanson wrote: .... ahahahaha... Brad, Brad, Brad, old buddy,.... you are talking to yourself again... ahahaha.... But then, the FULL MOON is coming up... ahaha Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 10:39*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote: *:::: BradGuth wrote: hanson wrote: ... ahahahaha... Brad, Brad, Brad, old buddy,.... you are talking to yourself again... ahahaha.... But then, the FULL MOON is coming up... ahaha Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson Thanks for the usual topic update, of adding nothing of any relevance whatsoever. We know, it's what you and others of your kind do best. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Planets and moons losing mass by the tonnes/sec | BradGuth | History | 163 | July 5th 09 01:00 AM |
Planets and moons losing mass by the tonnes/sec | BradGuth | Policy | 7 | April 6th 09 02:49 PM |
Planets and moons losing mass by the tonnes/sec | BradGuth | Policy | 5 | March 29th 09 07:46 PM |