![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Painius wrote,
What *exactly* is instantaneous about the gravitational effect, and how and why is it different than what i wrote? I get the sense that we're still not 'communicating' on what you term the 'gravitational effect' and its instantaneity irrespective of distance. Lemme try an entirely diffrunt approach. The "force of gravity" always points directly at the center of the gravitator irrespective of distance from the gravitator. Thus the "force of gravity" always intersects the planets' orbits without aberration, resulting in the orbits' stability over billions of years. Probably maybe shoulda tried this appraoch earlier. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sun action | U.R. Yerkanovalott | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 19th 08 03:17 AM |
Sun action | ThomA[_3_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 9th 07 07:56 PM |
Beginning of Gravity's Time | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | July 14th 07 02:35 PM |
Action-at-a-distance | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 2nd 06 03:26 AM |
Nike action, action extreme, or Scenix 10X50? | brucegooglegroups | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 28th 06 06:09 PM |