![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a tendency to determine the express seasonal changes in
respect to variations in the Sun's observed position against the Equator - http://www.radiosatellite.org/sirius_xm_orbits.gif The Sun's position in that animation is given North of the Equator as expressed by axial co-ordinates thereby via the traditional explanation which uses variable inclination however observations determine that no variation in inclination occurs as the Sun's constant inclination to the Equator remains constant over an annual orbital cycle giving a constant symmetry between daylight and darkness at that Equatorial coordinate - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwTrYVBcx9s I think that I may have destroyed my ability to discuss this matter openly and that is my loss but modern imaging and especially time lapse footage makes astronomy so interesting for those who make the effort.I see my name lumped in now with people of astrological and creationist convictions but unfortunately it happens that most here adhere to an astrological framework for justifying the motions of the Earth,including variable inclination as the cause of daylight/darkness and the total length of the natural noon cycles. I understand that people do not care,but with the endpoint of a new motion in the change in orbital orientation I am for the first time in years,quite tired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison on C5 | Michael Wood | Astronomy Misc | 6 | July 21st 03 06:01 PM |
Comparison on C5 | Michael Wood | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 21st 03 06:01 PM |
Comparison on C5 | Michael Wood | Misc | 6 | July 21st 03 06:01 PM |
Comparison on C5 | Rod Mollise | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 19th 03 05:36 PM |
Comparison on C5 | Bobsprit | Misc | 0 | July 19th 03 05:20 PM |