![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Southern Milky Way from Gates Co. NC, USA
Camera mounted piggyback on Losmandy G-11 No filter 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor D lens stopped to f/5.6 23 minute guided exposure/ISO 500 PP done in Photoshop. Uncropped, as was the last image that I posted. Scott -- Preston S Justis Astrophotography home page: http://mysite.verizon.net/psjustis/ ++++++++++++++++++++++ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Preston S Justis wrote: Southern Milky Way from Gates Co. NC, USA Camera mounted piggyback on Losmandy G-11 No filter 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor D lens stopped to f/5.6 23 minute guided exposure/ISO 500 PP done in Photoshop. Uncropped, as was the last image that I posted. Scott -- Preston S Justis Astrophotography home page: http://mysite.verizon.net/psjustis/ ++++++++++++++++++++++ Lots of M and B objects there! Just one frame of 23 minutes or many stacked shorter ones. If one that camera is low noise. Does it take a dark frame for noise reduction? What caused the yellow at the bottom left, a light? That lens does give really nice stars. See a couple hot pixels but not many at all. Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott, I'm surprised how well the HII regions are seen in your pictures. I'd
really like to know if the D200 is more sensitive to Halpha than the Canon cameras... Stefan "Preston S Justis" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:TWyWh.628$A72.316@trnddc07... Southern Milky Way from Gates Co. NC, USA Camera mounted piggyback on Losmandy G-11 No filter 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor D lens stopped to f/5.6 23 minute guided exposure/ISO 500 PP done in Photoshop. Uncropped, as was the last image that I posted. Scott -- Preston S Justis Astrophotography home page: http://mysite.verizon.net/psjustis/ ++++++++++++++++++++++ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick Johnson" wrote in message
... Preston S Justis wrote: Southern Milky Way from Gates Co. NC, USA Camera mounted piggyback on Losmandy G-11 No filter 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor D lens stopped to f/5.6 23 minute guided exposure/ISO 500 PP done in Photoshop. Uncropped, as was the last image that I posted. Scott -- Preston S Justis Astrophotography home page: http://mysite.verizon.net/psjustis/ ++++++++++++++++++++++ Lots of M and B objects there! Just one frame of 23 minutes or many stacked shorter ones. If one that camera is low noise. Does it take a dark frame for noise reduction? That is one frame. The camera has a setting that is called 'long exposure noise reduction'. Exposures of 8 seconds or longer can take advantage of this feature. I don't know if it takes dark frames or not. The noise reduction routine does take awhile to run after each exposure. If I remember correctly it took from 5-10 minutes. You have to let it finish before you can open the shutter again. As with any digital camera, using the 'bulb' setting will drain the battery pretty quick. What caused the yellow at the bottom left, a light? There was a tree limb or the corner of a barn protruding into that section of the frame. I did a quick and dirty photoshop job on it with the lasso tool and curves adjustment to lighten up that edge. That lens does give really nice stars. See a couple hot pixels but not many at all. There are quite a number of stars and it's hard to pick out the hot pixels with all of the star images. I've had that lens on one of my film bodies for 20 years and this is the first time I've used it to shoot the sky. The Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D is a really good performer and a good used one can be had for a modest price. Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stefan Lilge" wrote in message ... Scott, I'm surprised how well the HII regions are seen in your pictures. I'd really like to know if the D200 is more sensitive to Halpha than the Canon cameras... Stefan Believe it or not, there was quite a bit of skyglow that night. The originals were great, but kind of washed out. It didn't take long to process the images and I was surprised at the amount of HII I recorded. My friend had his Canon Rebel XTi and he was bragging about how well it recorded red nebulosity. He was using a Lumicon Deep Sky filter with an Orion 80mm ED refractor. The images were impressive, but slightly noisy as he was using ISO of 1600. The XTi is a very nice camera IMO. The Canon has a noise reduction feature as well. It didn't take nearly as long to run as my D200. (read my reply to Rick) We are going to try the D200 on his 80mm ED with the same filter and see how things go. I have to get another 2" camera adapter with 48mm threads to accept filters. I sold my old one thinking that I wasn't going to use it anymore! Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Preston S Justis" wrote
....... That is one frame. The camera has a setting that is called 'long exposure noise reduction'. Exposures of 8 seconds or longer can take advantage of this feature. I don't know if it takes dark frames or not. The noise reduction routine does take awhile to run after each exposure. If I remember correctly it took from 5-10 minutes. You have to let it finish before you can open the shutter again......... There ya go! This Nikon DSLR has been written up in the photo rags for having great noise reduction features and I bet that it kills off the hot pixels. I'd still go with a series of shorter exposures just in case a wind gust or something comes out of the night to mess up the exposure. I wonder if the camera will do it's 'noise reduction' on a saved file?? George N |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Normandin" wrote in message
... "Preston S Justis" wrote ...... That is one frame. The camera has a setting that is called 'long exposure noise reduction'. Exposures of 8 seconds or longer can take advantage of this feature. I don't know if it takes dark frames or not. The noise reduction routine does take awhile to run after each exposure. If I remember correctly it took from 5-10 minutes. You have to let it finish before you can open the shutter again......... There ya go! This Nikon DSLR has been written up in the photo rags for having great noise reduction features and I bet that it kills off the hot pixels. I'd still go with a series of shorter exposures just in case a wind gust or something comes out of the night to mess up the exposure. I wonder if the camera will do it's 'noise reduction' on a saved file?? I don't know if it will. It runs right after you take the image. I was shooting RAW+Hi res. jpeg. I forgot to mention that I was shooting in color mode 1 which enhances the reds in the image. There are three modes with 2 being a nuetral (balanced) color and 3 being a blue/green enhanced. I bought this camera to do macro and telephoto photograhy of daylight subjects and thought I'd try it out on some deep sky imaging. I'm very pleased with what I'm seeing so far. Scott George N |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: Nikon D200 First Light | Preston S Justis | Astro Pictures | 12 | April 28th 07 04:57 PM |
ASTRO: Moon 7 Dec (First Light image) | TheCroW | Astro Pictures | 2 | December 8th 06 11:12 AM |
ASTRO: New Image; Cone Nebula in [SII], [NII] and Ha Light | Richard Crisp | Astronomy Misc | 4 | February 12th 04 02:00 AM |
ASTRO: New Image; Cone Nebula in [SII], [NII] and Ha Light | Richard Crisp | CCD Imaging | 4 | February 12th 04 02:00 AM |