more details on the missing 'original Apollo-11 films'

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

What was shown has been preserved in other recordings of the broadcast
video,
but what seems lost is sharper views of these same scenes.

"Jim Oberg" wrote:

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

Nothing new that I could see there Jim.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

Derek Lyons wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote:

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

Nothing new that I could see there Jim.

Derek, I thought your reading comprehension was higher...

but what seems lost is sharper views of these same scenes.

"Even Polaroid photographs of the screen that showed the original
images received by Parkes are significantly sharper than what the
public saw of the first moon walk."

Of course, since the tapes *haven't* been found, we can't show you --
other than with the Polaroids -- how much sharper the originals were.
And after October, we can't play them back, even if we find them.
(Wish I really was part of the "we" looking for the tapes; that must be
more interesting than the DaVinci code)

/dps

Gee whiz folks, when exactly has our government ever not told us the
absolure truth, nor having destroyed evidence?


http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

In jest, I guess there's a first time in our pathetic history for
everything. Imagine that, we have ourselves yet another horrifically
spendy government agency that apparently made an actual mistake for the
very first, one and only time. Gosh, am I amazed, or what?

You folks have got to be kidding, as I suppose next we'll hear that the
secure vault of photographic archives as to all the original film that
was supposedly returned from the moon surface for terrestrial processing
will either have imploded or having vanished like all of those Iraq WMD.
Perhaps a significant meteor impact can be blamed for the loss of such
rad-hard film that was also double-IR tolerant and otherwise had such
unusually ****-poor DR that it made everything look so xenon illuminated
and thus somehow couldn't have recorded the absolute vibrance of Venus
that was unavoidably situated nearby in that crystal clear black sky as
of A-11, A-14 and A-16.

What about all of the R&D of the various prototype scaled fly-by-rocket
landers that somehow managed their daunting task of cruising such
tonnage past those horrific mascons, and of otherwise buffering against
the torque imposed by those above center of gravity bang-bang reaction
thrusters, and without such critical flight maneuvers ever involving
momentum reaction wheels. I suppose all of that's either become
stealth, invisible or gone missing.

There's so much that's simply dead wrong and/or skewed from the nearest
space-toilet about those supposed moon landings, that it begs for being
disclosed as simply a major cloak and dagger function of our hocus-pocus
and otherwise fully perpetrated cold-war(s), as having cost humanity
those trillions upon trillions for the past four wasted decades, and
counting.
-
Brad Guth



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

snidely wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote:

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

Nothing new that I could see there Jim.

Derek, I thought your reading comprehension was higher...

but what seems lost is sharper views of these same scenes.

"Even Polaroid photographs of the screen that showed the original
images received by Parkes are significantly sharper than what the
public saw of the first moon walk."

Of course, since the tapes *haven't* been found, we can't show you --
other than with the Polaroids -- how much sharper the originals were.
And after October, we can't play them back, even if we find them.
(Wish I really was part of the "we" looking for the tapes; that must be
more interesting than the DaVinci code)

/dps


When they find the tapes, they will discover that some Aussie recorded
over them with episodes of "Skippy the Kangaroo".

;-)

Rusty

Rusty wrote:


When they find the tapes, they will discover that some Aussie recorded
over them with episodes of "Skippy the Kangaroo".

;-)

Rusty



Lyrics: http://www.cfhf.net/lyrics/skippy.htm
God, now I'm getting a major league lust move for ONJ:
http://www.onlyolivia.com/

Pat

"snidely" wrote:


Derek Lyons wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote:

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html

Nothing new that I could see there Jim.

Derek, I thought your reading comprehension was higher...

My reading comprehension is just fine - it's you (no offense) who seem
to not have completed all the related reading.

but what seems lost is sharper views of these same scenes.

"Even Polaroid photographs of the screen that showed the original
images received by Parkes are significantly sharper than what the
public saw of the first moon walk."

That was in the paper published by one of the Parkes staff - which I
read a month or more ago.

Of course, since the tapes *haven't* been found, we can't show you --
other than with the Polaroids -- how much sharper the originals were.
And after October, we can't play them back, even if we find them.

That was in the paper published by one of the Parkes staff - which I
read a month or more ago.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On 5 Aug 2006 09:48:52 -0700, "Rusty" wrote:


snidely wrote:
Derek Lyons wrote:
"Jim Oberg" wrote:

He
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...198331869.html


When they find the tapes, they will discover that some Aussie recorded
over them with episodes of "Skippy the Kangaroo".


If only the tapes were in a pdf. Rusty would find them in a
heartbeat.

Derek Lyons wrote:
[...]

That was in the paper published by one of the Parkes staff - which I
read a month or more ago.


Ahh, a cite...now I understand.

Sometimes your economy of speech could be loosened for mutual benefit.

/dps

From: Jim Oberg
http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...for-a-man-a-gi...

What was shown has been preserved in other recordings of the broadcast
video, but what seems lost is sharper views of these same scenes.

Apparently these folks (aka MI/NSA~NASA spooks) simply can't read, much
less think, but they most certainly can lie their incest cloned butts
off (just like their resident LLPOF warlord GW Bush). Why am I not
surprised?
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG