![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What needs to be replaced to fix the current problems they are having with
the air contaminants? I really think that if they set their mind(and money) to it, this is an opportunity to get away from reliance on the shuttle. They should be able to launch the equipment needed on some other type of rocket, either Russian or American. But of course given NASA's current track record, it would take them 3 years to figure it out. Thanks, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the crux of the issue is not that the air is contaminated, but
that there are insufficient samples available to certify that it is not contaminated. Read the presentations on NASA watch to catch the flavor. If Pedro remains on orbit or if there are Soyuz used as cargo vessels then the med-ops manifest issues are lessened. "David Findlay" wrote in message . au... What needs to be replaced to fix the current problems they are having with the air contaminants? I really think that if they set their mind(and money) to it, this is an opportunity to get away from reliance on the shuttle. They should be able to launch the equipment needed on some other type of rocket, either Russian or American. But of course given NASA's current track record, it would take them 3 years to figure it out. Thanks, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems with Cassini? | Marshall Karp | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 23rd 04 08:51 PM |
Problems with Cassini | Marshall Karp | Space Shuttle | 8 | July 23rd 04 01:33 AM |
Current Space Station Problems | ElleninLosAngeles | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 24th 03 05:21 AM |
TMI Report:People problems vs. Equipment | Jim M Bowden | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 22nd 03 08:08 AM |
Mars trajectory problems? | Bill Clark | Space Science Misc | 0 | July 13th 03 11:25 PM |