![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a newbie question:
When I read reviews of EPs or binoculars on astro pages I often encounter the author sighing with please at the sight of the intense green reflection from the glass coatings (I call it "bug-eye green"). This is, apparently, seen as a sign of a high quality optic. On the other hand, I'm a photographer, and none of my Zeiss, Nikkor, and Leitz lenses (for 35mm), my Schneider and Nikkor lenses (for 4x5), my Zeiss lenses (for 6x6), nor my Pentax lenses (for 6x7)--not owned at the same time!--have ever shown anything remotely like this--all are multi-coated and perform very well. I also notice that my higher-priced Takahashi EPs don't show this, but that the cheaper EPs I own do. My (cheap by bino standards) Oberwerk binos are green, too. Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? --Darin Darin Boville Fine Art Photography and Video www.darinboville.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look
at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? The reason to use multi-coatings is to reduce the reflections at each air-glass surface. A modern high quality multi-coat usually has 3 layers applied to the surface of the glass. If done right, the reflectivity will be less than 0.3% average over a wide wavelength range. There are many refractive substances that can be used for this purpose, the most common being aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide and magnesium fluoride. These are applied using electron beam coating machines. The layer thicknesses must be very tightly controlled, otherwise the end result is not optimum, and higher overall reflection is the result. Some refractive mixtures will result in two nulls on either side of the central wavelength with a slight rise in the green, amounting to perhaps 0.5% at 530nm. This produces the characteristic faint green hue on these multi-coatings. Other mixtures may produce a broad minumum from blue to yellow with a slight rise at the red and violet ends of the spectrum. This produces a characteristic grape color with perhaps a faint reddish hue. In any case, these reflections are on the order of 10 times less than an uncoated surface. So what causes intense colors (bright green or red) on some glasses? These can be the result of using the wrong thickness layers (poor quality control) or using a cheaper evaporation process, or using many more layers or thicker layers than the optimum for lowest reflectivity. Take your pick. Roland Christen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look
at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? The reason to use multi-coatings is to reduce the reflections at each air-glass surface. A modern high quality multi-coat usually has 3 layers applied to the surface of the glass. If done right, the reflectivity will be less than 0.3% average over a wide wavelength range. There are many refractive substances that can be used for this purpose, the most common being aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide and magnesium fluoride. These are applied using electron beam coating machines. The layer thicknesses must be very tightly controlled, otherwise the end result is not optimum, and higher overall reflection is the result. Some refractive mixtures will result in two nulls on either side of the central wavelength with a slight rise in the green, amounting to perhaps 0.5% at 530nm. This produces the characteristic faint green hue on these multi-coatings. Other mixtures may produce a broad minumum from blue to yellow with a slight rise at the red and violet ends of the spectrum. This produces a characteristic grape color with perhaps a faint reddish hue. In any case, these reflections are on the order of 10 times less than an uncoated surface. So what causes intense colors (bright green or red) on some glasses? These can be the result of using the wrong thickness layers (poor quality control) or using a cheaper evaporation process, or using many more layers or thicker layers than the optimum for lowest reflectivity. Take your pick. Roland Christen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darin Boville wrote:
[...] Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? In addition to Roland's informative response, you may also find this web page to be of value: http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/reports-coating.htm Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darin Boville wrote:
[...] Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? In addition to Roland's informative response, you may also find this web page to be of value: http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/reports-coating.htm Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris1011" wrote in message ... Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? The reason to use multi-coatings is to reduce the reflections at each air-glass surface. A modern high quality multi-coat usually has 3 layers applied to the surface of the glass. If done right, the reflectivity will be less than 0.3% average over a wide wavelength range. There are many refractive substances that can be used for this purpose, the most common being aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide and magnesium fluoride. These are applied using electron beam coating machines. The layer thicknesses must be very tightly controlled, otherwise the end result is not optimum, and higher overall reflection is the result. Roland Christen Mr. C: Can you recommend any good literature on the whole refractor lense making process? it seems that this literature is scarce. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris1011" wrote in message ... Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? The reason to use multi-coatings is to reduce the reflections at each air-glass surface. A modern high quality multi-coat usually has 3 layers applied to the surface of the glass. If done right, the reflectivity will be less than 0.3% average over a wide wavelength range. There are many refractive substances that can be used for this purpose, the most common being aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide and magnesium fluoride. These are applied using electron beam coating machines. The layer thicknesses must be very tightly controlled, otherwise the end result is not optimum, and higher overall reflection is the result. Roland Christen Mr. C: Can you recommend any good literature on the whole refractor lense making process? it seems that this literature is scarce. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Tonkin wrote in message ...
Darin Boville wrote: [...] Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? In addition to Roland's informative response, you may also find this web page to be of value: http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/reports-coating.htm Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply Thanks for the reply and the link. Interesting artcle. (On a sidenote, I can't help but note that the much maligned Nikon series "E" lenes were used to illustrate the loewer quality single-coated lenses. Sort of sad in that these lenses were not at all bad optically, just that their hardware was not as nice as the mainstream Nikkors--Nikon, just put cheaper hardware on existing lens designs--often classic and famous designs--to be able to offer a lower cost lens. Also, the caption says this represents the what was offered in the 1950's to 1970's. Actually the 100mm was introduced for the first time in 1980!) --Darin Darin Boville Fine Art Photography and Video www.darinboville.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Tonkin wrote in message ...
Darin Boville wrote: [...] Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? In addition to Roland's informative response, you may also find this web page to be of value: http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/reports-coating.htm Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply Thanks for the reply and the link. Interesting artcle. (On a sidenote, I can't help but note that the much maligned Nikon series "E" lenes were used to illustrate the loewer quality single-coated lenses. Sort of sad in that these lenses were not at all bad optically, just that their hardware was not as nice as the mainstream Nikkors--Nikon, just put cheaper hardware on existing lens designs--often classic and famous designs--to be able to offer a lower cost lens. Also, the caption says this represents the what was offered in the 1950's to 1970's. Actually the 100mm was introduced for the first time in 1980!) --Darin Darin Boville Fine Art Photography and Video www.darinboville.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so, the Russian Maks that came out red, and the old MegaVista
eyepieces that were almost bright green were representative of poor coating application ? Jerry Chris1011 wrote: Is there any real reason to prefer the green, lovely as it is to look at, in actual use? Why do people praise the green reflection? The reason to use multi-coatings is to reduce the reflections at each air-glass surface. A modern high quality multi-coat usually has 3 layers applied to the surface of the glass. If done right, the reflectivity will be less than 0.3% average over a wide wavelength range. There are many refractive substances that can be used for this purpose, the most common being aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide and magnesium fluoride. These are applied using electron beam coating machines. The layer thicknesses must be very tightly controlled, otherwise the end result is not optimum, and higher overall reflection is the result. Some refractive mixtures will result in two nulls on either side of the central wavelength with a slight rise in the green, amounting to perhaps 0.5% at 530nm. This produces the characteristic faint green hue on these multi-coatings. Other mixtures may produce a broad minumum from blue to yellow with a slight rise at the red and violet ends of the spectrum. This produces a characteristic grape color with perhaps a faint reddish hue. In any case, these reflections are on the order of 10 times less than an uncoated surface. So what causes intense colors (bright green or red) on some glasses? These can be the result of using the wrong thickness layers (poor quality control) or using a cheaper evaporation process, or using many more layers or thicker layers than the optimum for lowest reflectivity. Take your pick. Roland Christen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Planet_X: Our 10th Planet | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 841 | May 16th 04 05:00 PM |
The Green Flash | Robert Sheaffer | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | February 1st 04 11:06 PM |
Green Hills Helps JPL go to Mars | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 11th 03 05:05 PM |