A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 24th 09, 12:13 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

What if I came up with another equivalence theory.? There are lots out
there as you know. my equivalence theory is based on a particles
size and mass is equal to the energy of its wave that it goes along
with. Photons,and electrons going through two slits one at a time but
showing two interference patterns proves my theory. Only in the micro
realm(tiny matter) is this reality. Two base balls in the macro can not
accomplish such weirdness. Still objects as bis as virus or even bucky
balls give reality to having matter and waves equivalent to each other
and thus perform the effect of two shadows that overlap each other on a
white screen behind the two close together slits. I hope this theory is
well received by all. I happen to like it and posted it in sci physics
group earlier today Trebert

  #2  
Old April 24th 09, 04:24 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,586
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
What if I came up with another equivalence theory.?


Equivalent to what? Remember some here get to work with the basics.


There are lots out
there as you know. my equivalence theory is based on a particles
size and mass is equal to the energy of its wave that it goes along
with. Photons,and electrons going through two slits one at a time but
showing two interference patterns proves my theory. Only in the micro
realm(tiny matter) is this reality. Two base balls in the macro can not
accomplish such weirdness. Still objects as bis as virus or even bucky
balls give reality to having matter and waves equivalent to each other
and thus perform the effect of two shadows that overlap each other on a
white screen behind the two close together slits. I hope this theory is
well received by all. I happen to like it and posted it in sci physics
group earlier today Trebert



  #3  
Old April 25th 09, 05:58 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

Mark working with basic knowledge in our macro world (realm) does not
relate well in the quantum microscopic world (micro realm) think or
(imagine) of a gamma wave relates to a photon much better than a radio
wave. Lots of experiments prove this so I just made gamma waves and a
photon being equivalent to each other. This is one of my Nobel theories
that imperial thinkers will come up with in about 20 years TreBert

  #4  
Old April 25th 09, 06:33 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

On Apr 23, 8:24*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message

...

What if I came up with another equivalence theory.?


Equivalent to what? *Remember some here get to work with the basics.

*There are lots out

there as you know. * * * * my equivalence theory is based on a particles
size and mass is equal to the energy of its wave that it goes along
with. Photons,and electrons going through two slits one at a time but
showing two interference patterns proves my theory. Only in the micro
realm(tiny matter) is this reality. Two base balls in the macro can not
accomplish such weirdness. *Still objects as bis as virus or even bucky
balls give reality to having matter and waves equivalent to each other
and thus perform the effect of two shadows that overlap each other on a
white screen behind the two close together slits. *I hope this theory is
well received by all. I happen to like it and posted it in sci physics
group earlier today * *Trebert


If you can't think outside the mainstream box, then simply don't
bother to think at all. At least that's what gave Hitler and most
every warlord since the power of their people, was their inability to
deductively think on their own.
~ BG
  #5  
Old April 26th 09, 02:05 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,586
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Mark working with basic knowledge in our macro world (realm) does not
relate well in the quantum microscopic world (micro realm) think or
(imagine) of a gamma wave relates to a photon much better than a radio
wave. Lots of experiments prove this so I just made gamma waves and a
photon being equivalent to each other. This is one of my Nobel theories
that imperial thinkers will come up with in about 20 years TreBert



Equivalence? Do you really think a light particle, a photon, is the same
thing as a gamma wave, the product of nuclear fusion?


  #6  
Old April 26th 09, 01:21 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

Mark Photons leave the fusion core of the Sun all with short gamma wave
lengths,and photons break through the Sun surface after a 200,000 year
trip in mixed wave lengths,as our brain sees as "white light" yes my
theory relates gamma wave with the particle photon. Best to keep in mind
gamma photons can kick electrons around,but not those photons carrying
long waves no matter how intense they are. TreBert

  #7  
Old April 27th 09, 12:15 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Mark Earnest
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,586
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Mark Photons leave the fusion core of the Sun all with short gamma wave
lengths,and photons break through the Sun surface after a 200,000 year
trip in mixed wave lengths,as our brain sees as "white light" yes my
theory relates gamma wave with the particle photon. Best to keep in mind
gamma photons can kick electrons around,but not those photons carrying
long waves no matter how intense they are. TreBert


200,000 years to break free from the Sun?
Wow, what a pressure cooker it takes to creat a photon!
Why is it so easy, then, to create them when we strike a match?
Are they aleady in existence from the time they were in the Sun,
and have maybe just been laying somewhere dormant, perhaps?


  #8  
Old April 27th 09, 12:24 AM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

On Apr 26, 4:15*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message

...

Mark *Photons leave the fusion core of the Sun all with short gamma wave
lengths,and photons break through the Sun surface after a 200,000 year
trip in mixed wave lengths,as our brain sees as "white light" * yes my
theory relates gamma wave with the particle photon. Best to keep in mind
gamma photons can kick electrons around,but not those photons carrying
long waves no matter how intense they are. *TreBert


200,000 years to break free from the Sun?
Wow, what a pressure cooker it takes to creat a photon!
Why is it so easy, then, to create them when we strike a match?
Are they aleady in existence from the time they were in the Sun,
and have maybe just been laying somewhere dormant, perhaps?


It's the thick and otherwise extremely dense soup of what is inside of
our sun that's slowing them new photons way the hell down. If our sun
had a whole lot more mass under much greater compression (such as
greater than a white dwarf), photons of the visual and IR spectrum
would hardly if ever leak out.

~ BG
  #9  
Old April 27th 09, 12:46 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if (particle and wave equivalence) ???

Mark Gamma photons created by fusion do not slow down,but are absorbed
and emitted by atoms.over and over. Which way and that way. I used
this known theory a lot in my photon thoughts. Seems strange all that
time needed for the average proton to go about 440,000 miles and only
take 8 minutes from surface of sun to Earth. Still that's the way it is
TreBert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photo How its a Wave How it is a Particle G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 March 16th 07 11:50 PM
EXHiBiT VELOCiTY & SPEED of light ..for DiFFERENT particle COUNTs.!! EXHiBiT ERROR-BARs for ALL "in-vacu" PARTiCLE-COUNTs, Cracked-pot.!! Many DiFFERENT particle-COUNTs *NOT* different SiTUATiONs, Dimwit.!! brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 November 21st 05 06:13 AM
Wave as wave, particle as particle newedana Astronomy Misc 24 May 10th 05 03:59 PM
Important find:when is the light wave-motion ?and when is particle-motion? xszxsz Science 0 October 28th 04 08:56 AM
Important find:when is the light wave-motion ?and when is particle-motion? xszxsz Research 0 October 27th 04 06:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.