![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Painius writ,
GR is the basis theory for such phenomena. Argh. :-) GR is a *description* of downstream *effects* of phenomena. The math of GR is supposed to be able to be used to explain all such... Argh. :-) The math of GR, as a "bookeeping", is supposed to be able to describe effects, not to "explain" anything. It currently describes effects of a universally-isotropic 'void-nothing' devoid of any density/volumetric gradients in gravity wells and at deep cosmological distances. That's why it needs an 'upgrade' on the scale that relativity itself was an upgrade of Newton. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 2 | January 19th 09 07:54 PM |
An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 16 | January 6th 09 10:42 PM |
An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | January 2nd 09 04:12 PM |
An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | December 28th 08 12:28 PM |
An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 2 | December 22nd 08 10:44 PM |