EINSTEINIANA IN PANIC

Note the number of the panicky authors:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...810.3475v1.pdf
"Albert Einstein’s postulate "that light is always propagated in empty
space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of
motion of the emitting body" [1] is one of the pillars of modern
physics. Modification of this postulate would have far-reaching
consequences for our understanding of nature, it is therefore
important
to constantly improve the verification of its validity. Particularly
in the past few decades, a possible energy dependence of the speed of
light has been predicted in the framework of quantum gravity models
[2, 3, 4] and effective field theory [5], leading to deviations from
this postulate (for reviews see [6, 7, 8])."

The "far-reaching consequences":

Albert Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by
the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

Pentcho Valev

In the last 12 months how many “main stream” astronomers or
physicists have altered their opinions based on your repeated postings
to this
group? (By “main stream” I mean employed in universities or other
academic establishment and by “altered their opinions” I mean
publicly accepted the validity of your views, rather than their
previous
opinions, in a peer reviewed publication)

If the answer to the above question is zero then why the ****** do
you keep posting here?


Your 5578 postings in 2008 alone creates the impression of a total
and bizarre obsession!

In the last 12 months how many “main stream” astronomers or
physicists have altered their opinions based on your repeated postings
to this
group? (By “main stream” I mean employed in universities or other
academic establishment and by “altered their opinions” I mean
publicly accepted the validity of your views, rather than their
previous
opinions, in a peer reviewed publication)

If the answer to the above question is zero then why the ****** do
you keep posting here?

Your 5578 postings in 2008 alone creates the impression of a total
and bizarre obsession!

He posted very complex Einstein physics, has knowledge of physics,
this place is not the University class of retard UK fascism, he ****es
in the mouth of big brother without question, though does not
speak of human rights crimes and hate libel (illness) and raised
interesting scientific questions.

On Dec 26, 5:27*am, " wrote:
In the last 12 months how many “main stream” astronomers or
physicists have altered their opinions based on your repeated postings
to this
group? (By “main stream” I mean employed in universities or other
academic establishment and by “altered their opinions” I mean
publicly accepted the validity of your views, rather than their
previous
opinions, in a peer reviewed publication)

If the answer to the above question is zero then why the ****** do
you keep posting here?

Your 5578 postings in 2008 alone creates the impression of a total
and bizarre obsession!

He posted very complex Einstein physics, has knowledge of physics,
this place is not the University class of retard UK fascism, he ****es
in the mouth of big brother without question, though does not
speak of human rights crimes and hate libel (illness) and raised
interesting scientific questions.

Here is a whole book about hate sub-criminating nazis of racist
subordinances.

When have you written a book the last time? The book also describes
the first magnopotent 3D wheels describing dark matter for the first
time. My book. I hate racists, compulsive deadly UK people with
cameras in the streets. They took the community to a new level that
violates humanity. They openly discriminate.

www.NewDirectionEurope.com/politics

In the last 12 months how many “main stream” astronomers or
physicists have altered their opinions based on your repeated postings
to this
group? (By “main stream” I mean employed in universities or other
academic establishment and by “altered their opinions” I mean
publicly accepted the validity of your views, rather than their
previous
opinions, in a peer reviewed publication)

If the answer to the above question is zero then why the ****** do
you keep posting here?

Your 5578 postings in 2008 alone creates the impression of a total
and bizarre obsession!

He posted very complex Einstein physics, has knowledge of physics,
this place is not the University class of retard UK fascism, he ****es
in the mouth of big brother without question, though does not
speak of human rights crimes and hate libel (illness) and raised
interesting scientific questions.

Here is a whole book about hate sub-criminating nazis of racist
subordinances.

When have you written a book the last time? The book also describes
the first magnopotent 3D wheels describing dark matter for the first
time. My book. I hate racists, compulsive deadly UK people with
cameras in the streets. They took the community to a new level that
violates humanity. They openly discriminate.

www.NewDirectionEurope.com/politics

In the last 12 months how many “main stream” astronomers or
physicists have altered their opinions based on your repeated postings
to this
group? (By “main stream” I mean employed in universities or other
academic establishment and by “altered their opinions” I mean
publicly accepted the validity of your views, rather than their
previous
opinions, in a peer reviewed publication)

If the answer to the above question is zero then why the ****** do
you keep posting here?

Your 5578 postings in 2008 alone creates the impression of a total
and bizarre obsession!

He posted very complex Einstein physics, has knowledge of physics,
this place is not the University class of retard UK fascism, he ****es
in the mouth of big brother without question, though does not
speak of human rights crimes and hate libel (illness) and raised
interesting scientific questions.

Here is a whole book about hate sub-criminating nazis of racist
subordinances.

When have you written a book the last time? The book also describes
the first magnopotent 3D wheels describing dark matter for the first
time. My book. I hate racists, compulsive deadly UK people with
cameras in the streets. They took the community to a new level that
violates humanity. They openly discriminate.

www.NewDirectionEurope.com/politics

Do you believe that the Special Theory of Relativity correctly predicts the
motion of bodies in inertial frames of reference where the affects of
gravity can be disregarded?

For example, do you believe that however much you accelerate a particle it
can't be made to travel faster than c, however much energy you pump into it?

On Dec 26, 10:34*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Note the number of the panicky authors:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...810.3475v1.pdf
"Albert Einstein’s postulate "that light is always propagated in empty
space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of
motion of the emitting body" [1] is one of the pillars of modern
physics. Modification of this postulate would have far-reaching
consequences for our understanding of nature, it is therefore
important
to constantly improve the verification of its validity. Particularly
in the past few decades, a possible energy dependence of the speed of
light has been predicted in the framework of quantum gravity models
[2, 3, 4] and effective field theory [5], leading to deviations from
this postulate (for reviews see [6, 7, 8])."

The "far-reaching consequences":

Albert Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by
the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...09145525ca.pdf
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

Einsteiniana' hypnotists trying to both camouflage the problem and
calm the panic (note the conversion of the dangerous "frequency-
dependent speed of light" into the toothless "time-dependent speed of
light":

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0264-9...20_202002.html
Joao Magueijo: "In spite of the strong reactions they elicit [8–10],
VSL theories may be nothing more offensive than non-trivial
realizations of the Lorentz group......The cosmological redshift acts
to convert a frequency-dependent speed of light into a time-dependent
speed of light. This idea was already recognized in [21], in a
different guise. If the speed of massless particles increases with
energy, then the fact that the 'average particle' has a higher energy
in the early universe means that the 'ambient' speed of light is also
higher."

Pentcho Valev

On Dec 26, 11:57*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Dec 26, 10:34*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:





Note the number of the panicky authors:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...810.3475v1.pdf
"Albert Einstein’s postulate "that light is always propagated in empty
space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of
motion of the emitting body" [1] is one of the pillars of modern
physics. Modification of this postulate would have far-reaching
consequences for our understanding of nature, it is therefore
important
to constantly improve the verification of its validity. Particularly
in the past few decades, a possible energy dependence of the speed of
light has been predicted in the framework of quantum gravity models
[2, 3, 4] and effective field theory [5], leading to deviations from
this postulate (for reviews see [6, 7, 8])."

The "far-reaching consequences":

Albert Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by
the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...0-433a-b7e3-4a...
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

Einsteiniana' hypnotists trying to both camouflage the problem and
calm the panic (note the conversion of the dangerous "frequency-
dependent speed of light" into the toothless "time-dependent speed of
light":

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0264-9...20_202002.html
Joao Magueijo: "In spite of the strong reactions they elicit [8–10],
VSL theories may be nothing more offensive than non-trivial
realizations of the Lorentz group......The cosmological redshift acts
to convert a frequency-dependent speed of light into a time-dependent
speed of light. This idea was already recognized in [21], in a
different guise. If the speed of massless particles increases with
energy, then the fact that the 'average particle' has a higher energy
in the early universe means that the 'ambient' speed of light is also
higher."

Pentcho Valev
- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
yes ibeleave the Special Theory of Relativity correctly predicts the
motion of bodies in inertial frames of reference where the affects of
gravity can be disregardedbecuase their is no case were their is zero
gravity any where we have observed in our known universe but maybe Im
wrong please correct me if so

On Dec 27, 12:10*am, RustyJames
wrote:
On Dec 26, 11:57*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:



On Dec 26, 10:34*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Note the number of the panicky authors:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...810.3475v1.pdf
"Albert Einstein’s postulate "that light is always propagated in empty
space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of
motion of the emitting body" [1] is one of the pillars of modern
physics. Modification of this postulate would have far-reaching
consequences for our understanding of nature, it is therefore
important
to constantly improve the verification of its validity. Particularly
in the past few decades, a possible energy dependence of the speed of
light has been predicted in the framework of quantum gravity models
[2, 3, 4] and effective field theory [5], leading to deviations from
this postulate (for reviews see [6, 7, 8])."

The "far-reaching consequences":

Albert Einstein: "If the speed of light is the least bit affected by
the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity and
theory of gravity is false."

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...0-433a-b7e3-4a....
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

Einsteiniana' hypnotists trying to both camouflage the problem and
calm the panic (note the conversion of the dangerous "frequency-
dependent speed of light" into the toothless "time-dependent speed of
light":

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0264-9...20_202002.html
Joao Magueijo: "In spite of the strong reactions they elicit [8–10],
VSL theories may be nothing more offensive than non-trivial
realizations of the Lorentz group......The cosmological redshift acts
to convert a frequency-dependent speed of light into a time-dependent
speed of light. This idea was already recognized in [21], in a
different guise. If the speed of massless particles increases with
energy, then the fact that the 'average particle' has a higher energy
in the early universe means that the 'ambient' speed of light is also
higher."

Pentcho Valev
- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

yes ibeleave *the Special Theory of Relativity correctly predicts the
motion of bodies in inertial frames of reference where the affects of
gravity can be disregardedbecuase their is no case were their is zero
gravity any where we have observed in our known universe but maybe Im
wrong please correct me if so

Anti-gravity can be created by the opposite of centrifugal forces,
centripetal forces that annihilate centrifugal forces. Gravity has
annihilating forces
as that, a body not only rotates, it gravitates. Gravitation becomes
centripetal because it pulls. Centripetal forces weaken centrifugal
forces. We only notice
this change of effect at the equator having no strong centrifugal
effects where
gravity weakens. Gravity can be controlled by motion of rotating
bodies where centrifugality could become zero gravity effect, given
the rotation is equally
fast to balance out gravity. Now balance further, we get anti-gravity,
a rotation
so fast, things move the other way up.