![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Wolfi
writes: For near-infrared filters, things get more complicated with the inclusion of air transmission accounting e.g. for water vapor and the response functions are shaped quite considerably by the atmosphere. Which filters do you mean? Most of the practical bands are not too bad. However, also in the optical regime the atmosphere has important contribution (with telluric lines, oxygen molecules etc...). I always though that such effects are corrected in the published photometry on night-by-night basis, so that's why filter transmission curves only are enough to generate synthetic optical magnitudes. If you want accurate synthetic magnitudes, you have to take the various bands into account. Yes, published photometry is corrected at some level on a night-by-night basis but generally to a "standard star system," which has some average value of atmospheric transmission, not 100%. But in the infrared case, the atmospheric contribution must is included in the filter transmissions published in literature. Which ones did you have in mind? Most filter curves I've seen don't include atmospheric transmission. I don't see how it would be possible, given the differences between sites. Photometry at, say, Mauna Kea is a lot different than at, say, Kitt Peak. Is published infrared photometry actually not corrected on night-by-night basis to eliminate the atmospheric contribution? There are in practice two corrections. Published photometry is corrected night-by-night for local extinction. This is usually taken to be color-independent, though that isn't necessarily the case. In addition, there are (much smaller) corrections for the different photometric systems at different observatories. These arise from slight variations in transmission of filters and other optics as well as differences in altitude and water vapor content. The latter corrections are often neglected; they are important only for very precise work on very red stars or stars with unusual spectral properties. If you have specific questions, feel free to contact me by email. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA (Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial email may be sent to your ISP.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photometry | Wolfi | Research | 0 | November 21st 08 09:16 AM |
Converting old photometry units | PrisNo6 | Research | 0 | April 8th 04 10:00 AM |
ETX90 and variable photometry | Bahjah | Misc | 1 | March 25th 04 09:20 AM |
High Speed Photometry | Ed Majden | Research | 0 | August 26th 03 11:10 PM |
High Speed Photometry | Ed Majden | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 24th 03 07:14 PM |