You're the one that doesn't believe in using the regular laws of
physics, nor believing in the replicated hard-science that easily
proves we haven't walked on that salty and otherwise gamma plus extra
hard-X-ray by day worth of a physically dark and nasty moon.

The likes of my having provided such links dozens of times before
obviously doesn't mean squat to your infomercial-science based koran,
not even of those tidbits contributed from your pagan NASA or any other
official site are of meaning as long as such science information can
taint the almighty NASA/Apollo ruse of the century, or further suggest
the cold-war was in fact fully perpetrated (mostly by us).

The same can be said of the ongoing ESA fiasco, such as for regarding
their bogus "stuck mirror" onboard their Venus EXPRESS mission.

Obviously you're not looking for the truth, such as "If the moon
landing was faked...", whereas instead you're here as further
damage-control on behalf of your brown nose best shielding NASA naked
butt. You and "tomcat" are one of a kind, yet you sleep with the likes
of Art Deco.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason why honest
folks are having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been
playing by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) having invented WMD seems to come to mind.

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm


wrote:
Notice my questions at the bottom of the post. You haven't provided
answer one to any of them, you've just repeated that the evidence is
there.

Believe it or not, you're the one who made the arguments, it's
therefore YOUR job to provide the actual evidence. Not to tell me to go
looking for it myself!

I am however impressed that you finally replied to a post. Even if it
was just to dodge the actual questions and simply repeat yourself.

Brad Guth wrote:
How about the proof-positive of Kodak physics and of the replicated
hard-science as to the visible spectrum, including the extra dosage of
near-UV and of UV-a photons which the human eye doesn't respond to, but
Kodak film does, and of how such photons tend to react and manage to
get recorded upon their Kodak film?

How about the regular laws of physics that simply do not add up to what
our NASA/Apollo wizards have been telling us?

How about NASA's very own gamma and hard-X-ray images of our moon?

Why is it that you're supposedly so smart but somehow unable to utilize
a GOOGLE or similar search engine?

BTW: those 85% reflective moonsuits and of the 80% reflective white of
our flags that blew in all of that wind are more than sufficient for
establishing the moonscape as being of 55+% reflective, plus having
multiple other artificial items of known albedo to work with seem fair.

What's a micron of dust per year worth afer a few million years? or
isn't our salty moon very old?

Dozens of other factors (including factors of radiation) have been
covered upon dozens of times, of which you're obviously too stupid
and/or dumbfounded as to locate for yourself. Why is that?

Now it seems that your own kind are telling you puck off. Why is that?

Why do you folks keep feeling the need as to put words in my mouth?

As per usual, this Usenet of e-spooks have been sharing as much
malware/****ware into my PC as their GOOGLE/Usenet can possibly
transfer without terminating itself.
-
Brad Guth


wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
I'll try this one again.

Try it as many times as you like. Apparently you have more time at the
keyboard than you do actually providing documentation for your claims.

Your post pretty much says; "I have the proof." Do you provide a link?
No.

So I ask again.

Where do you get your numbers on the light reflecting capabilities of
the moon?
(And why would these numbers, presumbably generated from Earth, have
any bearing on someone actually standing on the surface of the moon?)

Where do you get your numbers on the moon giving off radiation?

Where do you get your number on the depth of the dust on the lunar
surface?

And finally, what makes you think the depth of the dust on the lunar
surface is even across the face of the moon?