G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Who can tell you more about this than I Treb. I have already told
you using muli-universes answers the question of the 95% missing
gravity. Used our twin universe to show where anti-matter was used to
create our parallel universe To think the cosmos exists with just one
universe is very naive thinking. Our universe is not in the center of
the cosmos. I will keep adding good science thoughts to this
post. Being new and original and not in Google don't let that scare you.
Be brave and keep your mind open. Its the only way. Trebert


In order to explain the apparent missing mass in the galaxy, and the
expansion of the universe, much wild speculation has been made. Dark
matter, dark energy, and even parallel universes have been invoked.
But maybe gravity just isn't as simple as Newton's equation:

F = G m_1 m_2 / r^2.

How do we know the equation only has one term?

Nature isn't compelled to conform to simplicity. The ancients thought
that all the heavenly bodies moved in perfect circles. Even Copernicus
thought the Earth and planets moved in perfect circles. Something
might be moving in more than on circle (epicycles), but all motion was
basically circular.

But Kepler discovered that nature was not that simple. The planets
moved in ellipses, not circles.

So why should gravity be so simple as Newton's equation?

Perhaps it could be better described by an equation with more than one
term. Something like this:

F = -G_0 m_1 m_2 + G_1 m_1 m_2 /r + G_2 m_1 m_2 / r^2

where G_0 G_1 G_2

so the third term would predominant at the distances we usually measure
in our solar system and G_2 would be equal to the gravitational
constant we know.

But at galactic distances, the second term would become predominant,
and gravity would be greater at long distances than we would expect
form our old equation.

At very large distances, the first term would become predominant, and
G_0 would be equivalent to Einstein's Cosmological Constant, and
gravity would become repulsive.

It still doesn't explain how gravity works, but the gravity observed
can be described by this kind of a smooth mathematical model, then it
is how gravity essentially works and you can stop looking for missing
matter or energy to fudge your results with.

Now see how long till the Chinese steal my idea!

Double-A